Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38304537›Full record

ArticleJournal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry

Metal Release and Cytotoxicity of Different Orthodontic Bracket-Wire Combinations: An

Gunaseelan Aiswareya, Sanjeev K Verma, Saba Khan, Mohammad Owais, Izharul H Farooqi, Sufia Naseem

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gunaseelan AiswareyaDepartment of Orthodontics and Dental Anatomy, Dr. Z. A. Dental College, Aligarh, India.
Sanjeev K VermaDepartment of Orthodontics and Dental Anatomy, Dr. Z. A. Dental College, Aligarh, India.
Saba KhanDepartment of Orthodontics and Dental Anatomy, Dr. Z. A. Dental College, Aligarh, India.
Mohammad OwaisDepartment of Interdisciplinary Biotechnology Unit, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, India.
Izharul H FarooqiDepartment of Civil Engineering, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, India.
Sufia NaseemDepartment of Biochemistry, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, India.
Aligarh Muslim University · INGovt. Dental College & Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: To quantify and compare the metal ions released from different bracket-wire combinations and to assess their cytotoxicity. Materials and Methods: A total of 360 fabricated sectional fixed orthodontic appliances were divided into 6 groups. The first three groups consisted of stainless-steel brackets with stainless-steel, snickel-titanium (NiTi), and titanium-molybdenum alloy (TMA) archwires, and the other three groups were fabricated using ceramic brackets (polycrystalline alumina) with stainless-steel, NiTi, and TMA archwires. These appliances were immersed in artificial saliva (pH 6.5 ± 0.5, 37°C), for 1 week, 2 weeks, and 1 month. The nickel and chromium ions released in the artificial saliva were quantified using a flame atomic absorption spectrometer, and cytotoxicity assessment was performed using a 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay on human cervical cancer cell line. Results: The stainless-steel bracket groups displayed a significantly greater release of nickel and chromium ions compared to the ceramic bracket groups ( Conclusion: Considerably greater release of nickel and chromium ions was observed from the appliances utilizing stainless-steel brackets compared to those employing ceramic brackets. However, no remarkable difference in the levels of nickel and chromium ions was observed when comparing the three archwires: stainless steel, NiTi, and TMA. In the cytotoxicity assessment, the ceramic-TMA combination displayed the highest level of cytotoxicity, while the stainless-steel-TMA combination displayed the least cytotoxicity.

Indexed as

Ceramiccytotoxicitynickel titaniumstainless steeltitanium molybdenum alloy

Identifiers

PMID38304537
PMCPMC10829279
OpenAlexW4390354725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.