ArticleFrontiers in immunology2024
Diagnostic value of cerebrospinal fluid human epididymis protein 4 for leptomeningeal metastasis in lung adenocarcinoma.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development of Diagnostic Models and Biomarker Identification for Type 1 Leptomeningeal Metastasis in Lung Adenocarcinoma Using Olink: Exploratory Cohort Study with Internal Temporal Validation.Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2026Article
- Evaluation of cerebrospinal fluid human epididymis protein 4 for leptomeningeal metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer: a prospective cohort study.BMC cancer · 2026Article
- Advances in cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers for the diagnosis, treatment and monitoring of leptomeningeal metastases (Review).Oncology letters · 2026Review
- Cellular landscape and diagnostic value of TROP2 in cerebrospinal fluid of lung adenocarcinoma leptomeningeal metastases.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Article
- CSF proteomics identifies ADGRG1 as a predictive biomarker of intrathecal immune checkpoint inhibitor response in leptomeningeal metastasis.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2026Article
- Covalent organic framework-based electrochemical nanosensing: an emerging paradigm for early cancer diagnosis and longitudinal surveillance.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
- Integration of circulating biomarkers and clinical factors: construction and validation of a prediction model for lung cancer metastasis.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2025Article
- Diagnostic value of CEACAM6 and HE4 in pleural fluid for malignant pleural effusion.Annals of medicine · 2025Article
- Tumor Marker Test in Cerebrospinal Fluid for Leptomeningeal Metastasis Diagnosis and Response Assessment in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.European journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The diagnosis of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) remains a clinical challenge. Human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) functions as a novel tumor biomarker for cancers. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic value of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) HE4, and combined with CEACAM6, for LUAD LM. Methods: The CSF HE4 protein level was measured in two independent cohorts by electrochemiluminescence. Test cohort included 58 LUAD LM patients, 22 LUAD patients without LM (Wiot-LM), and 68 normal controls. Validation cohort enrolled 50 LUAD LM patients and 40 normal controls, in parallel with Wiot-LM patients without brain metastases (19 Wiot-LM/BrM patients) or with BrM (26 BrM patients). The CSF level of CEA, CA125, CA153, CA199, CA724, NSE and ProGRP of these samples was measured by electrochemiluminescence, whereas the CSF CEACAM6 level was detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). In addition, the serum level of these biomarkers was detected by same method as CSF. Results: The level of HE4 or CEACAM6 in CSF samples from LUAD LM patients was significantly higher than those from normal controls and Wiot-LM patients. The HE4 or CEACAM6 level in CSF was higher than that in serum of LM patient. The CSF HE4 or CEACAM6 level for distinguished LM from Wiot-LM showed good performance by receiver-operating characteristic analysis. The better discriminative power for LM was achieved when HE4 was combined with CEACAM6. In addition, the CSF HE4 and CEACAM6 level showed little or no difference between Wiot-LM/BrM and BrM patients, the BrM would not significantly influence the HE4 or CEACAM6 level in CSF. The diagnostic power of CSF CA125, CA153, CA199, CA724, NSE and ProGRP for LUAD LM were not ideal. Conclusion: The combination with HE4 and CEACAM6 has the promising application for the diagnosis of LUAD LM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.