Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38304397›Full record

ReviewPain reports

Recruitment and retention for chronic pain clinical trials: a narrative review.

Nan Kennedy, Sarah Nelson, Rebecca N Jerome, Terri L Edwards, Mary Stroud, Consuelo H Wilkins, Paul A Harris

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pain reports. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nan KennedyVanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Nashville, TN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1935-2973
Sarah NelsonVanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Nashville, TN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7015-8442
Rebecca N JeromeVanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Nashville, TN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6023-4269
Terri L EdwardsVanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Nashville, TN, USA.
Mary StroudVanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Nashville, TN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1981-8596
Consuelo H WilkinsVanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Nashville, TN, USA.
Paul A HarrisVanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Nashville, TN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1744-2011

Funding

Improving Clinical trial Education, Recruitment, and Enrollment at CTSA Hubs (I-CERCH) - HEAL SupplementU24TR001579 · NCATS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI HARRIS, PAUL A., WILKINS, CONSUELO HOPKINS · 2016 to 2022
$34.1M
NCATS NIH HHS U24 TR001579
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Opioid misuse is at a crisis level. In response to this epidemic, the National Institutes of Health has funded $945 million in research through the Helping to End Addiction Long-term (HEAL) Pain Management Initiative, including funding to the Vanderbilt Recruitment Innovation Center (RIC) to strategize methods to catalyze participant recruitment. The RIC, recognizing the challenges presented to clinical researchers in recruiting individuals experiencing pain, conducted a review of evidence in the literature on successful participant recruitment methods for chronic pain trials, in preparation for supporting the HEAL Pain trials. Study design as it affects recruitment was reviewed, with issues such as sufficient sample size, impact of placebo, pain symptom instability, and cohort characterization being identified as problems. Potential solutions found in the literature include targeted electronic health record phenotyping, use of alternative study designs, and greater clinician education and involvement. For retention, the literature reports successful strategies that include maintaining a supportive staff, allowing virtual study visits, and providing treatment flexibility within the trial. Community input on study design to identify potential obstacles to recruitment and retention was found to help investigators avoid pitfalls and enhance trust, especially when recruiting underrepresented minority populations. Our report concludes with a description of generalizable resources the RIC has developed or adapted to enhance recruitment and retention in the HEAL Pain studies. These resources include, among others, a Recruitment and Retention Plan Template, a Competing Trials Tool, and MyCap, a mobile research application that interfaces with Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap).

Indexed as

Clinical trial recruitment, Participant retention, Chronic pain trial, Opioid use disorder, Helping to End Addiction Long-Term (HEAL)

Identifiers

PMID38304397
PMCPMC10833632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.