Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38304363›Full record

ArticleActa clinica Croatica2023

COMPARISON OF LAPAROSCOPIC AND OPEN PYELOPLASTY IMPACT ON COMFORT AND SUCCESS: A RETROSPECTIVE, SINGLE CENTER STUDY.

Nuh Aldemir, İbrahim Üntan, Halil Tosun, Deniz Demirci

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta clinica Croatica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nuh AldemirMedipol University, Esenler Hospital, Department of Urology, İstanbul, Turkey.
İbrahim ÜntanAhi Evran University, Training and Research Hospital, Department of Urology, Kırşehir, Turkey.
Halil TosunVan Training and Research Hospital, Department of Pediatric Urology, Van, Turkey.
Deniz DemirciErciyes University Faculty of Medicine Hospitals, Department of Urology, Kayseri, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ureteropelvic junction obstruction causes hydronephrosis and may lead to renal parenchymal damage unless timely diagnosed and treated. Although open pyeloplasty is still the gold standard, it needs to be compared with new techniques. In this study, we compared laparoscopic and open pyeloplasty. Data on 113 patients who had undergone surgery between 2008 and 2014 were evaluated retrospectively. Thirty-nine patients had undergone laparoscopic pyeloplasty, and 74 had undergone open pyeloplasty. Ultrasonography was performed at 3 months and scintigraphy at 6 months postoperatively. Parameters such as the length of surgery, need for analgesics, length of hospital stay, complications, and success rates were compared. When compared to open pyeloplasty (mean 9.8 dexketoprofen 50 mg IV dose), the need for an analgesic was significantly lower in the laparoscopic pyeloplasty (mean 4.5, paracetamol 15 mg/kg IV dose) group (p<0.05). The length of hospital stay was also shorter in the laparoscopic pyeloplasty group (mean 4.0 days) than in the open pyeloplasty group (mean 7.3 days) (p<0.05). This study demonstrated that laparoscopic pyeloplasty could be safely used in the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction with a lower need for analgesics and a shorter length of hospital stay than with open pyeloplasty.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyUreteral ObstructionAnalgesicsHumansKidney PelvisRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeUrologic Surgical ProceduresAnalgesicsHydronephrosisLaparoscopic pyeloplastyOpen pyeloplastyUreteropelvic junction obstruction

Identifiers

PMID38304363
PMCPMC10829949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.