Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38304279›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical education and curricular development

Short-Term Training with Basic Science Research Literature Advances Medical Students' Skills for Adaptive Expertise.

Steve Maxwell, Robin Fuchs-Young, Gregg B Wells, Geoffrey Kapler, Sheila Green, Catherine Pepper, Barbara Gastel, David P Huston

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical education and curricular development. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Steve MaxwellDepartment of Cell Biology and Genetics, Texas A&M University, Bryan, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7764-9172
Robin Fuchs-YoungDepartment of Cell Biology and Genetics, Texas A&M University, Bryan, Texas, USA.
Gregg B WellsDepartment of Cell Biology and Genetics, Texas A&M University, Bryan, Texas, USA.
Geoffrey KaplerDepartment of Cell Biology and Genetics, Texas A&M University, Bryan, Texas, USA.
Sheila GreenMedical Sciences Library, Texas A&M University, Bryan, Texas, USA.
Catherine PepperMedical Sciences Library, Texas A&M University, Bryan, Texas, USA.
Barbara GastelDepartment of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, Texas A&M University, Bryan, Texas, USA.
David P HustonDepartment of Microbial Pathogenesis and Immunology, Texas A&M University, Bryan, Texas, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physicians must adapt their learning and expertise to the rapid evolution of healthcare. To train for the innovation-efficient demands of adaptive expertise, medical students need to acquire the skill of adaptive self-regulated learning, which includes accessing, interpreting, and synthesizing emerging basic and translational research to support patient care. In response, we developed the course Medical Student Grand Rounds (MSGR). It engages all pre-clerkship students at our institution with self-regulated learning from translational basic research literature. In this report, we describe MSGR's methodology and important outcomes. Students found, interpreted, critically assessed, and presented basic research literature about self-selected clinically relevant topics. In less than one semester and mentored by basic science researchers, they completed eight milestones: (a) search research literature databases; (b) choose a clinical topic using searching skills; (c) outline the topic's background; (d) outline a presentation based on the topic's mechanistic research literature; (e) attend translational research-oriented grand rounds by faculty; (f) learn to prepare oral presentations; (g) write an abstract; and (h) present at Grand Rounds Day, emphasizing their topic's research literature. Graded milestones and end-of-course self-assessments indicated students became proficient in interpreting research articles, preparing and delivering presentations, understanding links among basic and translational research and clinical applications, and pursuing self-regulated learning. Qualitative analysis of self-assessment surveys found most students thought they progressed toward the learning objectives: find scientific information about a research topic (56% positive responses), interpret and critically assess scientific information (64%), and prepare and deliver a scientific presentation (50%). Milestones improve time management and provide a scaffolded method for presenting focused research topics. MSGR equips students with critical thinking skills for lifelong, adaptive, self-regulated learning-a foundation for adaptive expertise. The master adaptive learner cycle of planning, learning, assessing, and adjusting is a conceptual framework for understanding students' MSGR learning experiences.

Indexed as

grand rounds presentationprofessional identityresearch faculty mentoringscaffolded learningtranslational basic science research literature

Identifiers

PMID38304279
PMCPMC10832445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.