ArticleArthroplasty today2024
In Vitro Investigation of Column Fixation Constructs for Periacetabular Osteotomy: Which Provide the Greatest Stiffness and Strength?
Article in Arthroplasty today, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Fixation of the mobile fragment in periacetabular osteotomy: a clinical study of two- vs. three-screw fixation with 4-week partial weight bearing.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2025Article
- Clinical and surgical factors influencing screw breakage during hardware removal following periacetabular osteotomy.Journal of hip preservation surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is an effective surgical procedure for managing acetabular dysplasia. The purpose of this study was to analyze the biomechanical properties of novel PAO constructs that incorporate orthopaedic trauma techniques. We hypothesize that these fixation methods will create a stiffer construct that tolerates higher loads to failure. Methods: Twenty bio-composite hemi-pelvises underwent PAO with the following fixation configurations: Group A: 4 iliac crest (IC) screws; Group B: 3 IC screws; Group C: 2 IC screws, 1 retrograde anterior column (AC) screw, and 1 lateral compression type-2 (LC2) screw directed from the anterior inferior iliac spine to the posterior inferior iliac spine; Group D: 1 AC screw, 1 LC2 screw, 1 posterior column screw; Group E: 2 LC2 screws, 1 AC screw. Constructs were loaded to failure on a material testing hydraulic press, and ultimate strength, stiffness, and osteotomy displacement were measured. Results: The highest load to failure was seen in group D (2511 N), which was significantly more than groups A (1528 N, Conclusions: This study supports column fixation methods used in orthopaedic trauma for PAO as biomechanically advantageous to traditional fixation techniques. These constructs may be beneficial to patients with weight-bearing concerns or early rehabilitation needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.