Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38304219›Full record

ArticleClinics in orthopedic surgery2024

Automatic Segmentation and Radiologic Measurement of Distal Radius Fractures Using Deep Learning.

Sanglim Lee, Kwang Gi Kim, Young Jae Kim, Ji Soo Jeon, Gi Pyo Lee, Kyung-Chan Kim, Suk Ha Jeon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinics in orthopedic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sanglim LeeDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Inje University Sanggye Paik Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8250-2343
Kwang Gi KimDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9714-6038
Young Jae KimDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0443-0051
Ji Soo JeonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6621-283X
Gi Pyo LeeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9785-3776
Kyung-Chan KimDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Inje University Sanggye Paik Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-8335-4395
Suk Ha JeonDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4336-4491

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Recently, deep learning techniques have been used in medical imaging studies. We present an algorithm that measures radiologic parameters of distal radius fractures using a deep learning technique and compares the predicted parameters with those measured by an orthopedic hand surgeon. Methods: We collected anteroposterior (AP) and lateral X-ray images of 634 wrists in 624 patients with distal radius fractures treated conservatively with a follow-up of at least 2 months. We allocated 507 AP and 507 lateral images to the training set (80% of the images were used to train the model, and 20% were utilized for validation) and 127 AP and 127 lateral images to the test set. The margins of the radius and ulna were annotated for ground truth, and the scaphoid in the lateral views was annotated in the box configuration to determine the volar side of the images. Radius segmentation was performed using attention U-Net, and the volar/dorsal side was identified using a detection and classification model based on RetinaNet. The proposed algorithm measures the radial inclination, dorsal or volar tilt, and radial height by index axes and points from the segmented radius and ulna. Results: The segmentation model for the radius exhibited an accuracy of 99.98% and a Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of 98.07% for AP images, and an accuracy of 99.75% and a DSC of 94.84% for lateral images. The segmentation model for the ulna showed an accuracy of 99.84% and a DSC of 96.48%. Based on the comparison of the radial inclinations measured by the algorithm and the manual method, the Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.952, and the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.975. For dorsal/volar tilt, the correlation coefficient was 0.940, and the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.968. For radial height, it was 0.768 and 0.868, respectively. Conclusions: The deep learning-based algorithm demonstrated excellent segmentation of the distal radius and ulna in AP and lateral radiographs of the wrist with distal radius fractures and afforded automatic measurements of radiologic parameters.

Indexed as

Deep LearningRadius FracturesWrist FracturesBone PlatesHumansRadiographyRadiusComputer-assisted radiographic image interpretationDeep learningDistal radius fractures

Identifiers

PMID38304219
PMCPMC10825247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.