ArticlePorto biomedical journal
Treatment of idiopathic overactive bladder with botulinum toxin: real-life results and patients' expectations.
Article in Porto biomedical journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy of 100-U Onabotulinumtoxin A Treatment in Female Idiopathic Overactive Bladder-A Prospective Follow-Up Study.International urogynecology journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Overactive bladder (OAB) is a prevalent syndrome affecting 11% to 16% of the adult population. When first-line pharmacological therapy is not effective, intradetrusorial injections of onabotulinumtoxinA (BTX-A) might have an important role in controlling symptoms. The main aim of this study was to access both the efficacy and safety of intradetrusor injections of 100U BTX-A in real clinical practice, among women with idiopathic OAB (iOAB). Methods: Retrospective study, based on clinical diaries in 136 iOAB female patients, with or without urinary incontinence, submitted to BTX-A injections, between 2005 and 2018 in a tertiary university hospital. Positive response was considered only when the patient mentioned she had great improvement after the injection, otherwise, it was considered negative. Results: A positive response was obtained in 90 patients (66%) after the first injection. Women with a positive response after the first treatment had 7.5 times more chances to improve with the second ( Conclusion: In real clinical practice, BTX-A injection is an effective (66%) and safe treatment, capable of improving quality of life. Moreover, responding to the first injection seems to predict good clinical outcomes in the second treatment. This procedure can be done with minimal restrictions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.