ArticleJournal of physical therapy science2024
The relationship between acceleration in sit-to-stand and falls in community-dwelling older adults: cross-sectional study.
Article in Journal of physical therapy science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrated analysis of load-velocity profiles, muscle ultrasound measures, and lifestyle determinants in older adults with and without fall history.GeroScience · 2026Article
- Quantitative assessment of the 30-second sit-to-stand test using computer vision technology for physical therapists.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Influence of thoracic asymmetry on trunk movement patterns during sit-to-stand motion.Journal of physical therapy science · 2026Article
- Time to stand up faster: underutilization of real-world sit-to-stand transition velocity in aging research.Frontiers in aging · 2026Article
- Interval walking training as a potential contributor to motor function improvement in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a retrospective analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
[Purpose] This study aimed to determine the relationship between acceleration parameters in the sit-to-stand (STS) movement and falls, and the strength of the association between acceleration in STS movements and falls in older adults. [Participants and Methods] In total, 330 older adults were included. Four acceleration parameters were measured in STS movement: maximum acceleration (MA), velocity (MV), power (MP), and stand-up time (ST). For the conventional STS tests, 5 times STS test (5xSTS) and ground reaction force (maximal rate of force development per body weight: RFD/w, peak reaction force per body weight: F/w, chair-rise time: T) were measured. Poisson regression analysis adjusted for confounding factors was used. [Results] In the model adjusted for confounders, significant associations were observed among MV (Prevalence ratio (PR): 0.75; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.58-0.98), MP (PR: 0.67; 95% Cl: 0.68-0.93), RFD/w (PR: 0.70; 95% Cl: 0.56-0.87), and T (PR: 1.14; 95% Cl: 1.05-1.24). [Conclusion] Among the acceleration parameters, MP was most strongly associated with falls and was considered the most useful parameter for evaluation. In addition, comparisons with the conventional chair rise tests suggested that MP was stronger than the 5xSTS test and may be equally related to the RFD/w.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.