ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology2024
Exploring Capabilities of Large Language Models such as ChatGPT in Radiation Oncology.
Article in Advances in radiation oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improving portability of knowledge-based planning using an LLM-driven plan refinement framework in lung radiotherapy.Medical physics · 2026Article
- Local large language model-guided optimization for prostate radiotherapy planning.Medical physics · 2026Article
- Article
- In Reply to Sengul I and Sengul D.Advances in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- In Reply to Hsu et al.Advances in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Feasibility of retrieval-augmented generation for large language models with Japanese input in radiotherapy.Journal of radiation research · 2026Article
- Leveraging large language models to populate structured clinical case report forms from unstructured medical notes in radiation oncology.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Article
- Evaluating the capability of large language models in radiotherapy through professional certification examinations in Japan.Journal of radiation research · 2026Article
- Performance of large language models on the radiation and cancer biology practice exam.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Temporal evolution of large language models (LLMs) in oncology.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
- Comparative Evaluation of a Medical Large Language Model in Answering Real-World Radiation Oncology Questions: Multicenter Observational Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Observational
- Large language models enable tumor-type classification and localization of cancers of unknown primary from genomic data.Cell reports. Medicine · 2025Article
- Performance of ChatGPT on optometry and vision science exam questions.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025Article
- An Australasian survey on the use of ChatGPT and other large language models in medical physics.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2025Article
- Review
- Assessing ChatGPT's Educational Potential in Lung Cancer Radiotherapy From Clinician and Patient Perspectives: Content Quality and Readability Analysis.JMIR cancer · 2025Article
- Servicing open-source large language models for oncology.The oncologist · 2025Article
- In Regard to Dennstädt et al.Advances in radiation oncology · 2025Article
- In Reply to Sengul I and Sengul D.Advances in radiation oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Technological progress of machine learning and natural language processing has led to the development of large language models (LLMs), capable of producing well-formed text responses and providing natural language access to knowledge. Modern conversational LLMs such as ChatGPT have shown remarkable capabilities across a variety of fields, including medicine. These models may assess even highly specialized medical knowledge within specific disciplines, such as radiation therapy. We conducted an exploratory study to examine the capabilities of ChatGPT to answer questions in radiation therapy. Methods and Materials: A set of multiple-choice questions about clinical, physics, and biology general knowledge in radiation oncology as well as a set of open-ended questions were created. These were given as prompts to the LLM ChatGPT, and the answers were collected and analyzed. For the multiple-choice questions, it was checked how many of the answers of the model could be clearly assigned to one of the allowed multiple-choice-answers, and the proportion of correct answers was determined. For the open-ended questions, independent blinded radiation oncologists evaluated the quality of the answers regarding correctness and usefulness on a 5-point Likert scale. Furthermore, the evaluators were asked to provide suggestions for improving the quality of the answers. Results: For 70 multiple-choice questions, ChatGPT gave valid answers in 66 cases (94.3%). In 60.61% of the valid answers, the selected answer was correct (50.0% of clinical questions, 78.6% of physics questions, and 58.3% of biology questions). For 25 open-ended questions, 12 answers of ChatGPT were considered as "acceptable," "good," or "very good" regarding both correctness and helpfulness by all 6 participating radiation oncologists. Overall, the answers were considered "very good" in 29.3% and 28%, "good" in 28% and 29.3%, "acceptable" in 19.3% and 19.3%, "bad" in 9.3% and 9.3%, and "very bad" in 14% and 14% regarding correctness/helpfulness. Conclusions: Modern conversational LLMs such as ChatGPT can provide satisfying answers to many relevant questions in radiation therapy. As they still fall short of consistently providing correct information, it is problematic to use them for obtaining medical information. As LLMs will further improve in the future, they are expected to have an increasing impact not only on general society, but also on clinical practice, including radiation oncology.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.