Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38304108›Full record

ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology2024

Effects of Wildfire Events on California Radiation Oncology Clinics and Patients.

Katie E Lichter, Claire C Baniel, Isabelle Do, Yasmeen Medhat, Vennela Avula, Leticia M Nogueira, James E Bates, Anna Paulsson, Nauman Malik, Robert A Hiatt and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in radiation oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Analysis and stress-test of the spatial accessibility to German radiation oncology centers.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Katie E LichterDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Claire C BanielDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Isabelle DoUniversity of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California.
Yasmeen MedhatUniversity of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California.
Vennela AvulaJohns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Leticia M NogueiraAmerican Cancer Society, Kennesaw, Georgia.
James E BatesDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Anna PaulssonProvidence Medical Group, Dayton, Ohio.
Nauman MalikDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Robert A HiattThe Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Sue S YomDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Osama MohamadDivision of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
University of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · USAmerican Cancer Society · USEmory University · USJohns Hopkins University · USProvidence College · USStanford University · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The effect of climate-driven events, such as wildfires, on health care delivery and cancer care is a growing concern. Patients with cancer undergoing radiation therapy are particularly vulnerable to treatment interruptions, which have a direct effect on survival. We report the results of a study characterizing the effect of wildfires on radiation oncology clinics and their patients. Methods and Materials: A survey of California radiation oncologists was used to evaluate emergency preparedness and the effect of wildfires on the delivery of radiation therapy services between 2017 and 2022. Descriptive statistics and Pearson's χ Results: Response rate was 12.3% (51/415 radiation oncologists), representing 25% of clinics (43/176) in 41% (24/58) of California counties. Sixty-one percent (31/51) of respondents reported being affected by a wildfire, 2 of which are rural clinics (100%, 2/2) and 29 are (59%, 29/49) metropolitan practices. Of these, 18% (9/51) reported a clinic closure, and 29% (15/51) reported staffing shortages. Respondents reported effects on patients, including having to evacuate (55%, 28/51), cancel/reschedule treatments (53%, 27/51), and experiencing physical, mental, or financial hardship due to wildfires (45%, 23/51). Respondents described effects on clinical operations, including being forced to transfer patients (24%, 12/51), transportation interruptions (37%, 19/51), regional/community evacuations (35%, 18/51), and physical/mental health effects (27%, 14/51) on clinic personnel. Less than half of the respondents (47%, 24/51) reported their workplace had a wildfire emergency preparedness plan. Additionally, geographic analysis revealed that 100% (176/176) of clinics were located within 25 miles of a wildfire. Conclusions: This study highlights the effects of wildfires on radiation oncology clinics and patients and underscores the need for emergency preparedness planning to minimize the consequences of such disasters.

Identifiers

PMID38304108
PMCPMC10831805
OpenAlexW4387860503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.