Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38304031›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023

Prognostic and predictive role of liquid biopsy in lung cancer patients.

Tuncay Goksel, Su Özgür, Aslı Tetik Vardarlı, Altuğ Koç, Haydar Soydaner Karakuş, Taha Reşid Özdemir, Kadri Murat Erdoğan, Ceyda Aldağ, Ali Veral, Berna Komurcuoglu and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Tuncay Goksel *Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Ege University Faculty of Medicine, Izmir, Türkiye.
Su Özgür *EgeSAM-Ege University Translational Pulmonary Research Center, Izmir, Türkiye.
Aslı Tetik VardarlıEgeSAM-Ege University Translational Pulmonary Research Center, Izmir, Türkiye.
Altuğ KoçDepartment of Translational Oncology, Institute of Oncology, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Türkiye.
Haydar Soydaner KarakuşDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Ege University Faculty of Medicine, Izmir, Türkiye.
Taha Reşid ÖzdemirDepartment of Medical Genetics, Health Sciences University, Izmir Tepecik Research and Training Hospital, Izmir, Türkiye.
Kadri Murat ErdoğanDepartment of Medical Genetics, Health Sciences University, Izmir Tepecik Research and Training Hospital, Izmir, Türkiye.
Ceyda AldağEgeSAM-Ege University Translational Pulmonary Research Center, Izmir, Türkiye.
Ali VeralDepartment of Medical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University, Izmir, Türkiye.
Berna KomurcuogluHealth Sciences University, Dr. Suat Seren Training and Research Hospital of Chest Diseases and Surgery, Izmir, Türkiye.
Pınar GursoyDepartment of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University, Izmir, Türkiye.
Mehmet Emin ArayiciDepartment of Cancer Epidemiology, Institute of Health Sciences, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Türkiye.
Asim LeblebiciDepartment of Translational Oncology, Institute of Health Sciences, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Türkiye.
Türkan YiğitbaşıDepartment of Medical Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Hülya EllidokuzDepartment of Preventive Oncology, Institute of Oncology, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Türkiye.
Yasemin BasbinarDepartment of Translational Oncology, Institute of Oncology, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Türkiye.
Ege University · TRDokuz Eylül University · TRIzmir University · TRIstanbul Medipol University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Lung cancer (LC) is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Approximately 80% of LC cases are of the non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) type, and approximately two-thirds of these cases are diagnosed in advanced stages. Only systemic treatment methods can be applied to patients in the advanced stages when there is no chance of surgical treatment. Identification of mutations that cause LC is of vital importance in determining appropriate treatment methods. New noninvasive methods are needed to repeat and monitor these molecular analyses. In this regard, liquid biopsy (LB) is the most promising method. This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of LB in detecting EGFR executive gene mutations that cause LC. Methods: One hundred forty-six patients in stages IIIB and IV diagnosed with non-squamous cell non-small cell LC were included. Liquid biopsy was performed as a routine procedure in cases where no mutation was detected in solid tissue or in cases with progression after targeted therapy. Liquid biopsy samples were also obtained for the second time from 10 patients who showed progression under the applied treatment. Mutation analyses were performed using the Cobas Results: Mutation positivity in paraffin blocks was 21.9%, whereas it was 32.2% in LB. Solids and LB were compatible in 16 patients. Additionally, while no mutation was found in solid tissue in the evaluation of 27 cases, it was detected in LB. It has been observed that new mutations can be detected not only at the time of diagnosis, but also in LB samples taken during the follow-up period, leading to the determination of targeted therapy. Discussion: The results showed that "liquid biopsy" is a successful and alternative non-invasive method for detecting cancer-causing executive mutations, given the limitations of conventional biopsies.

Indexed as

EGFRliquid biopsylung cancermutationreal time PCR

Identifiers

PMID38304031
PMCPMC10830640
OpenAlexW4390981371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.