ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2024
Education and training of clinical research professionals and the evolution of the Joint Task Force for Clinical Trial Competency.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Formation of a Translational Science Professional Identity: A Heuristic Framework and Research Agenda.Clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- Development of Core Competencies in Clinical Data Science Graduate Education: A Follow-On Tutorial to From Clinical Data Management to Clinical Data Science: Time for a New Educational Model.Clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- An NCI Micro-credentialing Model for Onboarding and Training Clinical Research Professionals in a Lean Fiscal Environment.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2026Article
- Factors Influencing the Clinical Research Behavior Among Physicians: A Qualitative Study.Advances in medical education and practice · 2026Article
- Article
- Scoping review of oncology clinical trials nursing: Roles, competencies, and evolving practice in cancer research.Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2026Article
- Developing the future clinical research workforce: An immersive high school clinical research summer camp.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- Beyond GCP: developing a differentiated competency framework for principal investigators in innovative drug clinical trials in China.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Vaccine Treatment and Evaluation Units: Why Support a "Ready Base" of Clinical Trial Sites?Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2025Article
- Development, implementation, and evaluation of an innovative clinical trial operations training program for Africa (ClinOps).BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Assessment of competencies of clinical research professionals and proposals to improve clinical research in Portugal.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Impact of Implementing Checklist Management Combined with SOP on Nursing Quality Among ENT Surgery Nurses.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2025Article
- Completion of a standardizable competency-based research training program improves understanding and preparedness for both new and experienced clinical research professionals.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Building trust in clinical research: a systems approach to ethical engagement and sustainable outcomes.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Pilot training for clinical research professionals in using empathy to recognize and respond to implicit bias in research recruitment and retention.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Clinical research professionals play a critical role in the design, conduct, and oversight of clinical trials, and they must have the knowledge, skills, and abilities to ensure that trials are conducted ethically, safely, and in accordance with regulatory requirements. As clinical research has evolved from being a necessary activity for the development and regulatory approval of new medicines to an accredited academic discipline and, more recently, to a globally recognized profession, the methods of education and training of professionals have also evolved. Initially, on-the-job informal coaching and specialized training organizations led to formalized and accredited academic degree programs and, more recently, to international competency standards and competency maintenance through continuous professional development. The Joint Task Force (JTF) for Clinical Trial Competency is a multidisciplinary, international group of experts who came together to aggregate and refine competency standards for clinical research professionals, first published in 2014. The 8 domains and 49 specific core competencies of the JTF Framework have become a globally recognized standard upon which education and training programs, role descriptions, and upward mobility criteria for professionals are now based. The JTF meets regularly and, through its workgroups, continues to evolve in response to the changing needs of the profession. The JTF is committed to continuous improvement to ensure that clinical research professionals have the competence necessary to conduct safe, ethical, and high-quality clinical research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.