Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38303963›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2023

The role of community engagement toward ensuring healthy lives: a case study of COVID-19 management in two Ghanaian municipalities.

Matilda Aberese-Ako, Phidelia Theresa Doegah, Lebene Kpodo, Wisdom Ebelin, Mawulom Kuatewo, Atubiga Alobit Baba, Atsu Godsway Kpordorlor, Samuel Yaw Lissah, Anthony Kolsabilik Kuug, Evelyn Ansah

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Matilda Aberese-AkoInstitute of Health Research, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Ghana.
Phidelia Theresa DoegahInstitute of Health Research, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Ghana.
Lebene KpodoPencils of Promise, Ho, Ghana.
Wisdom EbelinEvangelical Presbyterian Health Services, Evangelical Presbyterian Headquarters, Ho, Ghana.
Mawulom KuatewoHohoe Municipal Health Directorate, Ghana Health Service, Hohoe, Ghana.
Atubiga Alobit BabaSchool of Public Health, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Ghana.
Atsu Godsway KpordorlorInstitute of Health Research, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Ghana.
Samuel Yaw LissahDepartment of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Faculty of Applied Sciences and Technology, Ho Technical University, Volta Region, Ghana.
Anthony Kolsabilik KuugSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Ghana.
Evelyn AnsahInstitute of Health Research, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Ghana.
University of Health and Allied Sciences · GHEvangelical Presbyterian University College · GHGhana Health Service · GHHo Technical University · GHTamale Technical University

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Community engagement is one of the important requirements for strengthening health delivery in communities in a bid to achieve sustainable development goal 3, target 3.3 (SDG 3.3). The World Health Organization has strongly encouraged the use the five levels of community engagement, which are informing, consulting, planning, collaborating, and empowering communities in order to build resilience and to enable them contribute to the fight against diseases and for the uptake of health interventions. This study sought to explore and describe from the view of government institutions in Ghana how they engaged communities in COVID- 19 management and vaccine acceptance and how the communities within two municipalities also perceived the engagement process as well as the lessons that can be learned in engaging communities to deal with other health challenges and interventions toward the attainment of SDG 3 target 3.3. Materials and methods: This case study qualitative research project employed in-depth interviews among 36 respondents composed of government officials (the Ghana Health Service (GHS), the Information Services Department (ISD), the National Commission on Civic Education (NCCE) and two Municipal Assemblies), and community leaders and 10 focus group discussions among 87 men and women most of whom were natives and some migrants in two administrative municipalities in Ghana. Data were collected from June to September 2021. Audio interviews were transcribed and uploaded to Nvivo 12 to support triangulation, coding, and thematic analysis. Ethical approval was obtained from the University of Health and Allied Sciences' Research Ethics Committee and all COVID-19 restrictions were observed. Results: The findings revealed that all the four government institutions educated and informed the communities within their municipalities on COVID-19 management and vaccine acceptance. However, the Ghana Health Service was the most effective in the engagement spectrum of the other four; consulting, involving, collaborating, and empowering communities in the process of COVID-19 management and vaccine acceptance. The GHS achieved that through its CHPS program, which ensured a decentralized health service provision system with multiple programs and leveraging on its multiple programs to reach out to the communities. Government institutions such as the NCCE and the ISD faced challenges such as limited funding and support from the government to be able to carry out their tasks. Additionally, they were not involved with the communities prior to the pandemic and for that matter, they did not have access to community systems such as committees, and existing groups to facilitate the engagement process. Discussion: Using communities to support Ghana's attainment of the SDG 3 target 3.3 is possible; however, the government needs to provide funds and resources to the institutions responsible to enable them to carry out community engagement effectively. Also, promoting decentralization among institutions can strengthen community engagement processes. It is important that state institutions continue to strategize to empower communities in order to promote their participation in healthcare interventions and in the fight against infectious diseases in Ghana.

Indexed as

COVID-19VaccinesCitiesDelivery of Health CareFemaleGhanaHumansMaleVaccinescommunity-based health planning and servicescommunity engagementCOVID-19Ghanagovernment institutionshealthy livessustainable development goal 3

Identifiers

PMID38303963
PMCPMC10832024
OpenAlexW4390984886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.