Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38303893›Full record

ArticleJournal of dental sciences2024

Applying machine learning to assess the morphology of sculpted teeth.

Fang-Yu Fan, Wei-Chun Lin, Huei-Yu Huang, Yung-Kang Shen, Yung-Chun Chang, Heng-Yu Li, Muhammad Ruslin, Sheng-Yang Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of dental sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Fang-Yu FanSchool of Dental Technology, College of Oral Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Wei-Chun LinSchool of Dental Technology, College of Oral Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Huei-Yu HuangDepartment of Dentistry, Taipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Yung-Kang ShenSchool of Dental Technology, College of Oral Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yung-Chun ChangGraduate Institute of Data Science, College of Management, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Heng-Yu LiSchool of Dental Technology, College of Oral Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Muhammad RuslinDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, Indonesia.
Sheng-Yang LeeDepartment of Dentistry, Wan-Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/purpose: Producing tooth crowns through dental technology is a basic function of dentistry. The morphology of tooth crowns is the most important parameter for evaluating its acceptability. The procedures were divided into four steps: tooth collection, scanning skills, use of mathematical methods and software, and machine learning calculation. Materials and methods: Dental plaster rods were prepared. The effective data collected were to classify 121 teeth (15th tooth position), 342 teeth (16th tooth position), 69 teeth (21st tooth position), and 89 teeth (43rd tooth position), for a total of 621 teeth. The procedures are divided into four steps: tooth collection, scanning skills, use of mathematical methods and software, and machine learning calculation. Results: The area under the curve (AUC) value was 0, 0.5, and 0.72 in this study. The precision rate and recall rate of micro-averaging/macro-averaging were 0.75/0.73 and 0.75/0.72. If we took a newly carved tooth picture into the program, the current effectiveness of machine learning was about 70%-75% to evaluate the quality of tooth morphology. Through the calculation and analysis of the two different concepts of micro-average/macro-average and AUC, similar values could be obtained. Conclusion: This study established a set of procedures that can judge the quality of hand-carved plaster sticks and teeth, and the accuracy rate is about 70%-75%. It is expected that this process can be used to assist dental technicians in judging the pros and cons of hand-carved plaster sticks and teeth, so as to help dental technicians to learn the tooth morphology more effectively.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceDigital dental technologyMachine learningRestorationTooth morphology

Identifiers

PMID38303893
PMCPMC10829735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.