Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38303886›Full record

ArticleJournal of dental sciences2024

Convolutional-neural-network-based radiographs evaluation assisting in early diagnosis of the periodontal bone loss via periapical radiograph.

I-Hui Chen, Chia-Hua Lin, Min-Kang Lee, Tsung-En Chen, Ting-Hsun Lan, Chia-Ming Chang, Tsai-Yu Tseng, Tsaipei Wang, Je-Kang Du

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of dental sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

I-Hui ChenDivision of Periodontology, Department of Dentistry, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Chia-Hua LinDepartment of Dentistry, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Min-Kang LeeDivision of Family Dentistry, Department of Dentistry, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Tsung-En ChenDepartment of Dentistry, Kaohsiung Municipal Ta-Tung Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Ting-Hsun LanDivision of Prosthodontics, Department of Dentistry, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Chia-Ming ChangDepartment of Computer Science, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Tsai-Yu TsengDepartment of Computer Science, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Tsaipei WangDepartment of Computer Science, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Je-Kang DuDivision of Prosthodontics, Department of Dentistry, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital · TWNational Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TWKaohsiung Medical University · TWKaohsiung Municipal Ta-Tung Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/Purpose: The preciseness of detecting periodontal bone loss is examiners dependent, and this leads to low reliability. The need for automated assistance systems on dental radiographic images has been increased. To the best of our knowledge, no studies have quantitatively and automatically staged periodontitis using dental periapical radiographs. The purpose of this study was to evaluate periodontal bone loss and periodontitis stage on dental periapical radiographs using deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs). Materials and methods: 336 periapical radiographic images (teeth: 390) between January 2017 and December 2019 were collected and de-identified. All periapical radiographic image datasets were divided into training dataset (n = 82, teeth: 123) and test dataset (n = 336, teeth: 390). For creating an optimal deep CNN algorithm model, the training datasets were directly used for the segmentation and individual tooth detection. To evaluate the diagnostic power, we calculated the degree of alveolar bone loss deviation between our proposed method and ground truth, the Pearson correlation coefficients (PCC), and the diagnostic accuracy of the proposed method in the test datasets. Results: The periodontal bone loss degree deviation between our proposed method and the ground truth drawn by the three periodontists was 6.5 %. In addition, the overall PCC value of our proposed system and the periodontists' diagnoses was 0.828 ( Conclusion: This tool helps with diagnosis and prevents omission, and this may be especially helpful for inexperienced younger doctors and doctors in underdeveloped countries. It could also dramatically reduce the workload of clinicians and timely access to periodontist care for people requiring advanced periodontal treatment.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceClassificationConvolutional neural networksPeriodontal bone lossPeriodontitis

Identifiers

PMID38303886
PMCPMC10829720
OpenAlexW4387578912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.