ArticleJournal of dental sciences2024
Deep learning algorithms for classification and detection of recurrent aphthous ulcerations using oral clinical photographic images.
Article in Journal of dental sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- OralSegNet: An Approach to Early Detection of Oral Disease Using Transfer Learning.Oral diseases · 2026Article
- Use of Artificial Intelligence for Diagnosing Oral Mucosa Conditions: A Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Modern Medicine: Clinical Applications, Economic Implications, and Ethical Considerations.Current pharmaceutical design · 2026Review
- Diagnostic Performance of Multimodal Large Language Models in the Analysis of Oral Pathology.Oral diseases · 2025Article
- Article
- Neural network models for diagnosing recurrent aphthous ulcerations from clinical oral images.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Deep learning system for the differential diagnosis of oral mucosal lesions through clinical photographic imaging.Journal of dental sciences · 2025Article
- The Detection of Pulp Stones with Automatic Deep Learning in Panoramic Radiographies: An AI Pilot Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/purpose: The application of artificial intelligence diagnosis based on deep learning in the medical field has been widely accepted. We aimed to evaluate convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for automated classification and detection of recurrent aphthous ulcerations (RAU), normal oral mucosa, and other common oral mucosal diseases in clinical oral photographs. Materials and methods: The study included 785 clinical oral photographs, which was divided into 251 images of RAU, 271 images of the normal oral mucosa, and 263 images of other common oral mucosal diseases. Four and three CNN models were used for the classification and detection tasks, respectively. 628 images were randomly selected as training data. In addition, 78 and 79 images were assigned as validating and testing data. Main outcome measures included precision, recall, F1, specificity, sensitivity and area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC). Results: In the classification task, the Pretrained ResNet50 model had the best performance with a precision of 92.86%, a recall of 91.84%, an F1 score of 92.24%, a specificity of 96.41%, a sensitivity of 91.84% and an AUC of 98.95%. In the detection task, the Pretrained YOLOV5 model had the best performance with a precision of 98.70%, a recall of 79.51%, an F1 score of 88.07% and an AUC of Precision-Recall curve 90.89%. Conclusion: The Pretrained ResNet50 and the Pretrained YOLOV5 algorithms were shown to have superior performance and acceptable potential in the classification and detection of RAU lesions based on non-invasive oral images, which may prove useful in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.