ArticleJournal of dental sciences2024
Evaluation of neck control strategies for oral squamous cell carcinoma of stage I: Neck dissection or potential immunotherapy.
Article in Journal of dental sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neck dissection improves the prognosis of patients with early-stage oral squamous cell carcinoma.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Neck Dissection and Survival Among Head and Neck Cancer Patients Undergoing Adjuvant Immunotherapy.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2025Article
- Personalized mRNA vaccine combined with PD-1 inhibitor therapy in a patient with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.American journal of cancer research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The neck control strategies of early-stage oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) patients with clinical node-negative neck remain uncertain. These patients could be benefit from elective neck dissection (END) alongside primary tumor excision; but current evidence on END versus observation for OSCC of stage I only is not yet analyzed collectively in detail. Herein, this short communication aimed to evaluate the neck control strategies of stage I OSCC, mainly END versus observation. A total of 740 patients with stage I OSCC, comprising 434 underwent END and 306 received observation, were identified from literature. The results showed that stage I OSCC patients would not be benefit from END based on the analysis of neck nodal recurrence and overall survival. An ideal strategy would likely be to avoid neck dissection for stage I OSCC patients with N0 neck. Immune checkpoint therapy is such a potential strategy, which aims at eliciting potent antitumor immune responses within lymph nodes hold promise for treating patients with early-stage OSCC and may prove more efficacious than lymphadenectomy in a variety of scenarios. Consequently, neck dissection for stage I OSCC could be approached with caution, particularly in patients receiving immune checkpoint therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.