ArticleJournal of dental sciences2024
Analysis of mandibular molar anatomy in Taiwanese individuals using cone beam computed tomography.
Article in Journal of dental sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- A cone-beam computed tomography-based morphometric comparison of mandibular molars between Han Chinese and Malays.Journal of dental sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/purpose: Before periapical surgery in the mandibular posterior teeth is performed, the thicknesses of the buccal alveolar bone wall and buccolingual root might be a critical issue. This study aimed to assess the anatomical structure of the posterior region of the mandible in Taiwanese individuals using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Materials and methods: The CBCT images of 96 Taiwanese individuals (51 male and 45 female), which included 192 mandibular first molars and 192 mandibular second molars, were imported into medical imaging software to measure the buccal alveolar bone thickness and buccolingual root thickness at 3 mm above the root apex. Statistical analysis was conducted to examine the impact of tooth position, gender, and age on the anatomical position of mandibular molars. Results: The buccal alveolar bone thickness at 3 mm above the root apex of the mandibular second molar demonstrates a significantly higher value when compared to that of the first molar. Nonetheless, concerning the buccolingual root thickness, no significant differences were observed between these two teeth. In addition, the buccal alveolar bone thickness and buccolingual root thickness at 3 mm above the root apex may not be influenced by gender and age. Conclusion: The anatomical structures of the posterior region of the mandible in Taiwanese individuals exhibited variations between the mandibular first and second molars. However, these differences were not influenced by gender or age.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.