ArticleJournal of dental sciences2024
Biofabricated poly (γ-glutamic acid) bio-ink reinforced with calcium silicate exhibiting superior mechanical properties and biocompatibility for bone regeneration.
Article in Journal of dental sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/purpose: The modification in 3D hydrogels, tissue engineering, and biomaterials science has enabled us to fabricate novel substitutes for bone regeneration. This study aimed to combine different biomaterials by 3D technique to fabricate a promising all-rounded hydrogel for bone regeneration. Materials and methods: In this study, glycidyl methacrylate (GMA)-modified poly γ-glutamic acid (γ-PGA-GMA) hydrogels with calcium silicate (CS) hydrogel of different concentrations were fabricated by a 3D printing technique, and their biocompatibility and capability in bone regeneration were also evaluated. Results: The results showed that CS γ-PGA-GMA could be successfully fabricated, and the presence of CS enhanced the rheological and mechanical properties of γ-PGA-GMA hydrogels, thus making them more adept at 3D printing and implantations. SEM images of the surface structure showed that higher CS concentrations (5% and 10%) contributed to denser surface architectures, thus achieving improved cellular adhesion and stem cell proliferation. Furthermore, higher concentrations of CS resulted in elevated expressions of osteogenic-related markers such as alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and osteocalcin (OC), as well as enhanced calcium deposition represented by the increased Alizarin Red S staining. In vivo studies referring to critical defects of rabbit femur further showed that the existence of hydrogels alone was able to induce partial bone regeneration, demonstrated by the results from quantitative and qualitative analysis of micro-CT scans. However, CS alterations caused significant increases in bone regeneration, as indicated by micro-CT and histological staining. Conclusion: These results robustly suggest combining different biomaterials is crucial to producing a well-rounded hydrogel for tissue regeneration. We hope this study could be applied as a platform for others to brainstorm potential out-of-the-box solutions, contributing to developing high-potential biomaterials for bone regeneration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.