ArticleJournal of dental sciences2024
Evaluating photodynamic therapy for oral precancerous lesions: Highlighting outcome measure of malignant transformation.
Article in Journal of dental sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dual-action approach to oral cancer therapy: integrating HDAC inhibition and photodynamic therapy with LXD191.Lasers in medical science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The main outcome measure assessed in previous studies on photodynamic therapy (PDT) for oral precancerous lesions (OPL) is clinical response based on the alteration in lesion size after treatment. However, the primary and secondary outcome measures of the interventions for OPL should be malignant transformation and recurrence. Thus, the objective of this short communication is to summarize the evidence on PDT in preventing the recurrence and malignant transformation of OPL. There were 16 eligible studies which addressed the issue of OPL patients who received PDT with recurrence outcome, and the pooled recurrence rate (95% confidence interval) was analyzed to be 20.1% (16.2-24.6%). Notably, only 1 study reported that 7.5% of malignant transformation rate for OPL received PDT. These should be interpreted with caution due to low-level evidence, such as differences in study design, clinical and pathological features of patients enrolled, limited sample size, short follow-up time. Given few evaluated the effect of PDT on malignant transformation, we highlight that this primary outcome measure of OPL needs to be investigated in further well-designed longitudinal studies with adequate follow-up periods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.