Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38303629›Full record

ArticleThe International journal of eating disorders2024

Change in motivational bias during treatment predicts outcome in anorexia nervosa.

Sophie R Abber, Susan M Murray, Carina S Brown, Christina E Wierenga

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The International journal of eating disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sophie R AbberDepartment of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3057-6812
Susan M MurrayEating Disorders Center for Treatment and Research, Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego Health, San Diego, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3246-0357
Carina S BrownEating Disorders Center for Treatment and Research, Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego Health, San Diego, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4262-1238
Christina E WierengaEating Disorders Center for Treatment and Research, Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego Health, San Diego, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4843-1809
UC San Diego Health System · USFlorida State University · USSan Diego State University · US

Funding

Incentive Processing and Learning in Anorexia Nervosa and Bulimia NervosaR01MH125880 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI CHRISTINA E WIERENGA · 2022 to 2026
$3.6M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH125880
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveReward and punishment sensitivity are known to be altered in anorexia nervosa (AN). Most research has examined these constructs separately although motivated behavior is influenced by considering both the potential for reward and risk of punishment. The present study sought to compare the relative balance of reward and punishment sensitivity in AN versus healthy controls (HCs) and examine whether motivational bias is associated with AN symptoms and treatment outcomes.

methodsAdolescents and adults with AN (n = 262) in a partial hospitalization program completed the Eating Disorders Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q), Behavioral Inhibition System/Behavioral Activation System (BIS/BAS) scales, and Sensitivity to Punishment/Sensitivity to Reward Questionnaire (SPSRQ) at admission and discharge. HCs (HC; n = 90) completed the BIS/BAS and SPSRQ. Motivational Bias Scores were calculated to reflect the dominance of reward versus punishment sensitivity.

resultsIndividuals with AN demonstrated significantly greater bias toward punishment sensitivity than HC. In AN, a bias toward punishment was associated with higher EDE-Q Global score at admission. Change in motivational bias during treatment predicted EDE-Q Global scores, but not BMI, at discharge, with greater increases in reward sensitivity or greater decreases in punishment sensitivity during treatment predicting lower eating pathology. Similar findings were observed using the BIS/BAS and SPSRQ. DISCUSSION: Change in motivational bias during treatment is associated with improved outcomes in AN. However, it appears that much of the change in motivational bias can be attributed to changes in punishment sensitivity, rather than reward sensitivity. Future research should examine the mechanisms underlying punishment sensitivity decreases during treatment. PUBLIC SIGNIFICANCE: Sensitivity to reward and punishment may be important treatment targets for individuals with anorexia nervosa (AN). To date, most research has considered reward and punishment sensitivity separately, rather than examining their relationship to each other. We found that the balance of reward and punishment sensitivity (i.e., motivational bias) differs between healthy controls and those with AN and that this bias is associated with eating disorder symptoms and treatment outcome.

Indexed as

Anorexia NervosaAdolescentAdultHumansMotivationPunishmentRewardSurveys and Questionnairesanorexia nervosamotivation to approachmotivation to avoidpunishment sensitivityreward sensitivity

Identifiers

PMID38303629
PMCPMC10947895
OpenAlexW4391478841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.