Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38303567›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association2024

Real-world sequential treatment patterns and clinical outcomes among patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma in Japan.

Yuki Kita, Hikari Otsuka, Katsuhiro Ito, Takuto Hara, Soichiro Shimura, Takashi Kawahara, Minoru Kato, Sojun Kanamaru, Koji Inoue, Hiroki Ito and 11 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
13.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Prognostic value of the HALP score in patients with testicular cancer: a retrospective study.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 17 institutions in 1 country.

Yuki KitaDepartment of Urology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6942-9695
Hikari OtsukaDepartment of Urology, Tazuke Kofukai Medical Research Institute, Kitano Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Katsuhiro ItoDepartment of Urology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6322-9190
Takuto HaraDepartment of Urology, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4524-2815
Soichiro ShimuraDepartment of Urology, Kitasato University, Tokyo, Japan.
Takashi KawaharaDepartment of Urology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6494-819X
Minoru KatoDepartment of Urology, Osaka Metropolitan University, Osaka, Japan.
Sojun KanamaruDepartment of Urology, Kobe City Nishi-Kobe Medical Center, Kobe, Japan.
Koji InoueDepartment of Urology, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Kurashiki, Japan.
Hiroki ItoDepartment of Urology, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan.
Atsushi IgarashiDepartment of Urology, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan.
Tomokazu SazukaDepartment of Urology, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8902-7853
Dai TakamatsuDepartment of Urology, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Kohei HashimotoDepartment of Urology, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0873-4642
Takashige AbeDepartment of Urology, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5468-7632
Sei NaitoDepartment of Urology, Yamagata University, Tsuruoka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6104-4344
Yoshiyuki MatsuiDepartment of Urology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroyuki NishiyamaDepartment of Urology, Yamagata University, Tsuruoka, Japan.
Hiroshi KitamuraDepartment of Urology, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan.
Takashi KobayashiDepartment of Urology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1069-2816
Japan Urological Oncology Group
Kyoto University · JPYamagata University · JPChiba University · JPHokkaido University · JPKitano Hospital · JPKitasato Institute Hospital · JPKobe City Medical Center General Hospital · JPKobe City Nishi-Kobe Medical Center · JPKobe University Hospital · JPKurashiki Central Hospital · JPKyushu University · JPOsaka Metropolitan University · JPSapporo Medical University · JPTokyo National Hospital · JPUniversity of Toyama · JPUniversity of Tsukuba · JPYokohama City University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesImmune checkpoint inhibitors and enfortumab vedotin have opened new avenues for sequential treatment strategies for locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC). In the pre-enfortumab vedotin era, many patients could not receive third-line treatment owing to rapid disease progression and poor general status. This study aimed to analyze real-world sequential treatment practices for la/mUC in Japan, with a focus on patients who do not receive third-line treatment.

methodsWe analyzed data for 1023 la/mUC patients diagnosed between January 2020 and December 2021 at 54 institutions from a Japanese nationwide cohort.

resultsAt the median follow-up of 28.5 months, the median overall survival from first-line initiation for 905 patients who received systemic anticancer treatment was 19.1 months. Among them, 81% and 32% received second- and third-line treatment. Notably, 52% had their treatment terminated before the opportunity for third-line treatment. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that low performance status (≥1), elevated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (≥3), and low body mass index (<21 kg/m

conclusionsThis study highlights the high frequency of factors associated with poor tolerance to anticancer treatment in la/mUC patients. The findings suggest the need to establish optimal sequential treatment strategies, maximizing efficacy within time and tolerance constraints, while concurrently providing strong supportive care, considering immunological and nutritional aspects.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Transitional CellAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsJapanMaleMiddle AgedPractice Patterns, Physicians'Retrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsUrologic NeoplasmsImmune Checkpoint Inhibitorschemotherapyenfortumab vedotinimmune checkpoint inhibitorsequential treatmenturothelial carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID38303567
PMCPMC11524141
OpenAlexW4391483441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.