Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38303155›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of surgical pathology2024

Primary Well-Differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumor/Carcinoid of the Prostate: Case Report and Review of Literature.

Mohamed Alhamar, Shenon Sethi, Victor E Reuter, Samson W Fine

Open access · greenAbstract readCase ReportsReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of surgical pathology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Neuroendocrine differentiation in prostate neoplasms.Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mohamed AlhamarDepartment of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Shenon SethiDepartment of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Victor E ReuterDepartment of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Samson W FineDepartment of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4322-3736
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primary well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor (WDNT)/carcinoid of the genitourinary tract is rare. Many WDNT reported in the prostate gland have been seen in close association with conventional prostatic adenocarcinoma and/or label for prostate-specific immunohistochemical markers and are best considered prostatic adenocarcinomas with "carcinoid-like" features. We present a case of primary WDNT/carcinoid incidentally detected in a 67-year-old man who underwent radical prostatectomy for Grade group 2 prostatic adenocarcinoma. Morphologically, the neuroendocrine (NE) lesion appeared distinct from the prostatic adenocarcinoma, labeled for NE markers, was negative for prostatic markers (NKX3.1, PSA, and ERG), and showed an overall low Ki-67 proliferation index (<1%). Follow-up was uneventful with no evidence of residual disease or metastasis.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoid TumorNeuroendocrine TumorsProstatectomyProstatic NeoplasmsAgedHumansIncidental FindingsMaleProstateBiomarkers, Tumorcarcinoidneuroendocrineprostatic adenocarcinoma

Identifiers

PMID38303155
PMCPMC11808340
OpenAlexW4391482273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.