Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38303008›Full record

SynthesisWorld journal of surgical oncology2024

Prognostic factors for invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma of the lung: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ting Zhao, Jianhua Yi, Dan Luo, Junjun Liu, Xianming Fan, Qibiao Wu, Wenjun Wang

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in World journal of surgical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The value of fibrosis score andJournal of thoracic disease · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ting Zhao *Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital, Southwest Medical University, 646099, Luzhou, Sichuan, China.
Jianhua Yi *Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital, Southwest Medical University, 646099, Luzhou, Sichuan, China.
Dan Luo *Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital, Southwest Medical University, 646099, Luzhou, Sichuan, China.
Junjun LiuDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital, Southwest Medical University, 646099, Luzhou, Sichuan, China.
Xianming FanDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital, Southwest Medical University, 646099, Luzhou, Sichuan, China. fxm129@163.com.
Qibiao WuFaculty of Chinese Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Quality Research in Chinese Medicine and University Hospital, Macau University of Science and Technology, Taipa, 999078, Macao, China. qbwu@must.edu.mo.
Wenjun WangDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital, Southwest Medical University, 646099, Luzhou, Sichuan, China. wangwenjun2005@163.com.
Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University · CNMacau University of Science and Technology · MO

Funding

Sichuan Science and Technology Program No.2022YFS0631The Natural Science Foundation of Sichuan Province No.2022NSFSC0046the Science and Technology Development Fund, Macau SAR No. 0098/2021/A2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInvasive mucinous adenocarcinoma of the lung (IMA) is a unique and rare subtype of lung adenocarcinoma with poorly defined prognostic factors and highly controversial studies. Hence, this study aimed to comprehensively identify and summarize the prognostic factors associated with IMA.

methodsA comprehensive search of relevant literature was conducted in the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases from their inception until June 2023. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) of overall survival (OS) and/or disease-free survival (DFS) were obtained to evaluate potential prognostic factors.

resultsA total of 1062 patients from 11 studies were included. In univariate analysis, we found that gender, age, TNM stage, smoking history, lymph node metastasis, pleural metastasis, spread through air spaces (STAS), tumor size, pathological grade, computed tomography (CT) findings of consolidative-type morphology, pneumonia type, and well-defined heterogeneous ground-glass opacity (GGO) were risk factors for IMA, and spiculated margin sign was a protective factor. In multivariate analysis, smoking history, lymph node metastasis, pathological grade, STAS, tumor size, and pneumonia type sign were found to be risk factors. There was not enough evidence that epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) mutations, CT signs of lobulated margin, and air bronchogram were related to the prognosis for IMA.

conclusionIn this study, we comprehensively analyzed prognostic factors for invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma of the lung in univariate and multivariate analyses of OS and/or DFS. Finally, 12 risk factors and 1 protective factor were identified. These findings may help guide the clinical management of patients with invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma of the lung.

Indexed as

Adenocarcinoma, MucinousAdenocarcinoma of LungLung NeoplasmsPneumoniaFemaleHumansLungLymphatic MetastasisMaleNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRetrospective StudiesInvasive mucinous adenocarcinoma of the lungMeta-analysisPrognostic factorsSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID38303008
PMCPMC10835932
OpenAlexW4391482941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.