ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2024
Relationship between polymorphisms and mutations at rs7125942 and rs3736228 of LRP5 gene and bone metabolism in postmenopausal women.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Can some algorithms of machine learning identify osteoporosis patients after training and testing some clinical information about patients?BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo analyze the relationship between the polymorphism and mutation of rs7125942 and rs3736228 locus in the low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 5 (LRP5) genotype and bone mineral density (BMD) in postmenopausal women in Xinjiang, China, to provide a basis for prevention and treatment of the disease.
methodsAccording to the results of dual-energy X-ray (DEXA) determination of BMD, the 136 subjects were divided into three groups: Group A: normal bone mass, Group B: osteopenia, Group C: osteoporosis. 1. Age, body, mass index (BMI), and menopause of all subjects were recorded. 2. Fasting blood glucose (FBG), glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), calcium (Ca), phosphorus (P), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and clinical biochemical data were determined. 3. LRP5 locus polymorphisms were determined by time-of-flight mass spectrometry.
results1. Compared with group A, the age, ALP, Cr, and BUN levels in group B and group C were increased, but UA levels were lower (P < 0.05), and Serum P was higher in the group C (P < 0.05). 2. There was no statistically significant difference in the prevalence of diabetes between the three groups (P > 0.05). 3. The ROC curves for different BMD sites such as L1, L2, L3, L4, L total, and femoral neck were 0.929, 0.955, 0.901, 0.914, 0.885, and 0.873 (P < 0.01). 4. At rs7125942 locus, there was statistically significant difference in the distribution of wild-type (CC) and mutant (CG) with the normal bone mass (NBM) group and the abnormal bone mass (ABM) group (P < 0.05). 5. At rs7125942 locus, compared with wild-type (CC), mutant (CG) had lower LDL and FPG in NBM group (P < 0.05), and lower serum ALP in the ABM group (P < 0.05). At rs3736228 locus, the BMD (Femoral neck) of mutant (CT/TT) was lower than that of wild-type (CC) in the NBM group (P < 0.05). 6. Age and menopausal years were negatively correlated with BMD of the femoral neck and L1-4 (P < 0.05), and BMI and TG were positively (P < 0.05), and the results of multiple linear regression analysis showed that age, BMI, and TG were both independent factors affecting BMD (P < 0.05).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.