ArticleBMC oral health2024
Enhancing deep learning classification performance of tongue lesions in imbalanced data: mosaic-based soft labeling with curriculum learning.
Article in BMC oral health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Review on Image Processing and Fractal Analysis in Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders.Oral diseases · 2026Review
- AI-assisted image analysis ofBioinformation · 2026Article
- Neural network models for diagnosing recurrent aphthous ulcerations from clinical oral images.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Automated classification of oral potentially malignant disorders and oral squamous cell carcinoma using a convolutional neural network framework: a cross-sectional study.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence and the diagnosis of oral cavity cancer and oral potentially malignant disorders from clinical photographs: a narrative review.Frontiers in oral health · 2025Review
- Review
- Improved classification of oral cancer through a personalized transfer learning CNN architecture.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs) are associated with an increased risk of cancer of the oral cavity including the tongue. The early detection of oral cavity cancers and OPMDs is critical for reducing cancer-specific morbidity and mortality. Recently, there have been studies to apply the rapidly advancing technology of deep learning for diagnosing oral cavity cancer and OPMDs. However, several challenging issues such as class imbalance must be resolved to effectively train a deep learning model for medical imaging classification tasks. The aim of this study is to evaluate a new technique of artificial intelligence to improve the classification performance in an imbalanced tongue lesion dataset.
methodsA total of 1,810 tongue images were used for the classification. The class-imbalanced dataset consisted of 372 instances of cancer, 141 instances of OPMDs, and 1,297 instances of noncancerous lesions. The EfficientNet model was used as the feature extraction model for classification. Mosaic data augmentation, soft labeling, and curriculum learning (CL) were employed to improve the classification performance of the convolutional neural network.
resultsUtilizing a mosaic-augmented dataset in conjunction with CL, the final model achieved an accuracy rate of 0.9444, surpassing conventional oversampling and weight balancing methods. The relative precision improvement rate for the minority class OPMD was 21.2%, while the relative [Formula: see text] score improvement rate of OPMD was 4.9%.
conclusionsThe present study demonstrates that the integration of mosaic-based soft labeling and curriculum learning improves the classification performance of tongue lesions compared to previous methods, establishing a foundation for future research on effectively learning from imbalanced data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.