Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38302886›Full record

ArticleEuropean review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity2024

Defining and reporting exercise intensity in interventions for older adults: a modified Delphi process.

Bettina Wollesen, Mona Herden, Nicola Lamberti, Christoforos D Giannaki

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Reporting randomised trials of physical exercise or training interventions in older adults: the PETIO guideline.European review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity · 2025
    Article
  7. Requirements of health professionals and affected persons for an App-based dual-task training for hearing impaired older adults - a Delphi survey.European review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Correction: Defining and reporting exercise intensity in interventions for older adults: a modified Delphi process.European review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bettina WollesenInstitute of Human Movement Science, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany. bettina.wollesen@uni-hamburg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1082-9141
Mona HerdenInstitute of Human Movement Science, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-0687-2020
Nicola LambertiDepartment of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5763-3069
Christoforos D GiannakiDepartment of Life Sciences, School of Life and Health Sciences, University of Nicosia, Nicosia, Cyprus.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0029-1189

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany exercise studies, including older adults, do not report all relevant exercise characteristics. Especially the description of exercise intensity is missing and mostly not controlled. This leads to difficulties in interpreting study results and summarizing the evidence in systematic reviews or meta-analyses. Therefore, the aim of the present Delphi study was to gain recommendations about the categorization of exercise intensity and for the conducting and reporting of characteristics in future intervention studies with older adults by experts in exercise science and physiology.

methodsTwo hundred ninety-seven international interdisciplinary participants from an EU COST action were invited to participate in three rounds of online questionnaires in April/May 2023. Up to N = 93 experts participated in each round. Round 1 included open-ended questions to solicit possible recommendations and categorizations for light, moderate, vigorous, and high intensity. In round 2, the experts rated their agreement using Likert scales (1-10) on the revealed categories and recommendations. Clusters with a higher average rating of M = 8.0 were summarized into round 3. In the final round, the results were presented for a final rating of agreement (based on a simple majority > 50%).

resultsIn round 1 a total of 416 qualitative statements were provided from thirteen questions. From round 1 to round 3, a total of 38 items were excluded, with 205 items retained for the final consensus. In round three 37 participants completed the whole questionnaire. The experts showed overall agreement on the final categorizations with 6.7 to 8.8 out of 10 points on the Likert scale. They also showed broad consensus on the relevance of reporting exercise intensity and the recommendations for future conducting and reporting of study results. However, exercise types such as yoga, balance, and coordination training led to conflicting results for categorization into light or moderate. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: The results of the current survey can be used to classify the intensity of exercise and suggest a practical approach that can be adopted by the scientific community and applied when conducting systematic reviews and meta-analysis articles when vital and objective information regarding exercise intensity is lacking from the original article.

Indexed as

Delphi processExercise intensityExpert ratingOlder adults

Identifiers

PMID38302886
PMCPMC10835929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.