Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38302875›Full record

ArticleMolecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.)2024

A reliable transcriptomic risk-score applicable to formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded biopsies improves outcome prediction in localized prostate cancer.

Michael Rade, Markus Kreuz, Angelika Borkowetz, Ulrich Sommer, Conny Blumert, Susanne Füssel, Catharina Bertram, Dennis Löffler, Dominik J Otto, Livia A Wöller and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Michael Rade *Department of Diagnostics, Fraunhofer Institute for Cell Therapy and Immunology, Leipzig, Germany.
Markus Kreuz *Department of Diagnostics, Fraunhofer Institute for Cell Therapy and Immunology, Leipzig, Germany.
Angelika Borkowetz *Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Ulrich SommerInstitute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Conny BlumertDepartment of Diagnostics, Fraunhofer Institute for Cell Therapy and Immunology, Leipzig, Germany.
Susanne FüsselDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Catharina BertramDepartment of Diagnostics, Fraunhofer Institute for Cell Therapy and Immunology, Leipzig, Germany.
Dennis LöfflerDepartment of Diagnostics, Fraunhofer Institute for Cell Therapy and Immunology, Leipzig, Germany.
Dominik J OttoDepartment of Diagnostics, Fraunhofer Institute for Cell Therapy and Immunology, Leipzig, Germany.
Livia A WöllerDepartment of Diagnostics, Fraunhofer Institute for Cell Therapy and Immunology, Leipzig, Germany.
Carolin SchimmelpfennigDepartment of Diagnostics, Fraunhofer Institute for Cell Therapy and Immunology, Leipzig, Germany.
Ulrike KöhlDepartment of Diagnostics, Fraunhofer Institute for Cell Therapy and Immunology, Leipzig, Germany.
Ann-Cathrin GottschlingDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Pia HönscheidInstitute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Gustavo B BarettonInstitute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Manfred WirthDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Christian ThomasDepartment of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Friedemann HornDepartment of Diagnostics, Fraunhofer Institute for Cell Therapy and Immunology, Leipzig, Germany.
Kristin ReicheDepartment of Diagnostics, Fraunhofer Institute for Cell Therapy and Immunology, Leipzig, Germany. kristin.reiche@izi.fraunhofer.de.ORCID 0000-0002-4452-4872
Fraunhofer Institute for Cell Therapy and Immunology · DETechnische Universität Dresden · DECape Town HVTN Immunology Laboratory / Hutchinson Centre Research Institute of South Africa · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical manifestation of prostate cancer (PCa) is highly variable. Aggressive tumors require radical treatment while clinically non-significant ones may be suitable for active surveillance. We previously developed the prognostic ProstaTrend RNA signature based on transcriptome-wide microarray and RNA-sequencing (RNA-Seq) analyses, primarily of prostatectomy specimens. An RNA-Seq study of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor biopsies has now allowed us to use this test as a basis for the development of a novel test that is applicable to FFPE biopsies as a tool for early routine PCa diagnostics.

methodsAll patients of the FFPE biopsy cohort were treated by radical prostatectomy and median follow-up for biochemical recurrence (BCR) was 9 years. Based on the transcriptome data of 176 FFPE biopsies, we filtered ProstaTrend for genes susceptible to FFPE-associated degradation via regression analysis. ProstaTrend was additionally restricted to genes with concordant prognostic effects in the RNA-Seq TCGA prostate adenocarcinoma (PRAD) cohort to ensure robust and broad applicability. The prognostic relevance of the refined Transcriptomic Risk Score (TRS) was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox-regression models in our FFPE-biopsy cohort and 9 other public datasets from PCa patients with BCR as primary endpoint. In addition, we developed a prostate single-cell atlas of 41 PCa patients from 5 publicly available studies to analyze gene expression of ProstaTrend genes in different cell compartments.

resultsValidation of the TRS using the original ProstaTrend signature in the cohort of FFPE biopsies revealed a relevant impact of FFPE-associated degradation on gene expression and consequently no significant association with prognosis (Cox-regression, p-value > 0.05) in FFPE tissue. However, the TRS based on the new version of the ProstaTrend-ffpe signature, which included 204 genes (of originally 1396 genes), was significantly associated with BCR in the FFPE biopsy cohort (Cox-regression p-value < 0.001) and retained prognostic relevance when adjusted for Gleason Grade Groups. We confirmed a significant association with BCR in 9 independent cohorts including 1109 patients. Comparison of the prognostic performance of the TRS with 17 other prognostically relevant PCa panels revealed that ProstaTrend-ffpe was among the best-ranked panels. We generated a PCa cell atlas to associate ProstaTrend genes with cell lineages or cell types. Tumor-specific luminal cells have a significantly higher TRS than normal luminal cells in all analyzed datasets. In addition, TRS of epithelial and luminal cells was correlated with increased Gleason score in 3 studies.

conclusionsWe developed a prognostic gene-expression signature for PCa that can be applied to FFPE biopsies and may be suitable to support clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

Prostatic NeoplasmsTranscriptomeBiopsyFormaldehydeGene Expression ProfilingHumansMaleParaffin EmbeddingRisk FactorsRNAFormaldehydeRNAMolecular diagnostic testingMolecular pathologyPersonalized medicinePrognostic biomarkerProstate cancerTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID38302875
PMCPMC10835874
OpenAlexW4391430176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.