ArticleEuropean radiology experimental2024
Validating the accuracy of deep learning for the diagnosis of pneumonia on chest x-ray against a robust multimodal reference diagnosis: a post hoc analysis of two prospective studies.
Article in European radiology experimental, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Chest CT-scan for the Diagnosis of Community-acquired Pneumonia in Patients Visiting the Emergency Department
The Place of Imaging and Microbiology in the Diagnosis of Pneumonia in the Elderly: PneumOldCT
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial intelligence for pneumonia diagnosis: a systematic review of multimodal learning, fusion strategies, and explainability.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Pooled it
- Clinical evaluation of an AI-based pneumonia detection system on chest CT: a qualitative and quantitative analysis.Emergency radiology · 2026Article
- AI-Assisted Pneumonia Detection, Localisation and Report Generation from Chest X-rays.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Respiratory viral and bacterial co-infections in adults in acute care: A multiplex PCR-based study.PloS one · 2026Article
- PulmoX-Net: a channel-attention enhanced deep learning model for multi-class pulmonary pathology classification in chest radiography.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Accuracy of an Offline CNN Framework Utilizing Multi-View Chest X-Rays for Screening 14 Co-Occurring Communicable and Non-Communicable Diseases.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Distinct visual biases affect humans and artificial intelligence in medical imaging diagnoses.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Review
- An Empirical Evaluation of Low-Rank Adapted Vision-Language Models for Radiology Image Captioning.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Machine Learning Methods Developed for Prediction and Diagnosis of Pneumonia: A Systematic Review.Health science reports · 2025Review
- Multimodal text guided network for chest CT pneumonia classification.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundArtificial intelligence (AI) seems promising in diagnosing pneumonia on chest x-rays (CXR), but deep learning (DL) algorithms have primarily been compared with radiologists, whose diagnosis can be not completely accurate. Therefore, we evaluated the accuracy of DL in diagnosing pneumonia on CXR using a more robust reference diagnosis.
methodsWe trained a DL convolutional neural network model to diagnose pneumonia and evaluated its accuracy in two prospective pneumonia cohorts including 430 patients, for whom the reference diagnosis was determined a posteriori by a multidisciplinary expert panel using multimodal data. The performance of the DL model was compared with that of senior radiologists and emergency physicians reviewing CXRs and that of radiologists reviewing computed tomography (CT) performed concomitantly.
resultsRadiologists and DL showed a similar accuracy on CXR for both cohorts (p ≥ 0.269): cohort 1, radiologist 1 75.5% (95% confidence interval 69.1-80.9), radiologist 2 71.0% (64.4-76.8), DL 71.0% (64.4-76.8); cohort 2, radiologist 70.9% (64.7-76.4), DL 72.6% (66.5-78.0). The accuracy of radiologists and DL was significantly higher (p ≤ 0.022) than that of emergency physicians (cohort 1 64.0% [57.1-70.3], cohort 2 63.0% [55.6-69.0]). Accuracy was significantly higher for CT (cohort 1 79.0% [72.8-84.1], cohort 2 89.6% [84.9-92.9]) than for CXR readers including radiologists, clinicians, and DL (all p-values < 0.001).
conclusionsWhen compared with a robust reference diagnosis, the performance of AI models to identify pneumonia on CXRs was inferior than previously reported but similar to that of radiologists and better than that of emergency physicians. RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The clinical relevance of AI models for pneumonia diagnosis may have been overestimated. AI models should be benchmarked against robust reference multimodal diagnosis to avoid overestimating its performance.
trial registrationNCT02467192 , and NCT01574066 . KEY POINT: • We evaluated an openly-access convolutional neural network (CNN) model to diagnose pneumonia on CXRs. • CNN was validated against a strong multimodal reference diagnosis. • In our study, the CNN performance (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve 0.74) was lower than that previously reported when validated against radiologists' diagnosis (0.99 in a recent meta-analysis). • The CNN performance was significantly higher than emergency physicians' (p ≤ 0.022) and comparable to that of board-certified radiologists (p ≥ 0.269).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.