ArticleAdvances in therapy2024
Treatment Outcomes with Standard of Care in Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Real-World Data Analysis.
Article in Advances in therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Efficacy and Safety of Glofitamab Plus Polatuzumab Vedotin in Relapsed/Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma Including High-Grade B-Cell Lymphoma: Results From a Phase Ib/II Trial.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2025Trial
- Glofitamab in refractory or relapsed diffuse large B cell lymphoma after failing CAR-T cell therapy: a phase 2 LYSA study.Nature cancer · 2025Trial
- Phase 1 study of zanubrutinib plus lenalidomide for patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.Blood advances · 2026Article
- Metabolic tumor volume and total lesion glycolysis for predicting prognosis in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a retrospective PET/CT study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Article
- Indirect Comparison of Epcoritamab Versus Axicabtagene Ciloleucel in Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell-Eligible and -Naive Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia · 2025Article
- Risk Assessment With Ultra-Low-Pass Whole-Genome Sequencing of Cell-Free DNA for Large B-Cell Lymphoma.JCO precision oncology · 2025Article
- CD20×CD3 Bispecific Antibodies in B-NHL: A Review of Translational Science, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Dose Strategy in Clinical Research.Clinical and translational science · 2025Review
- Time to progression is a simple and robust prognostic factor for survival in relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2025Article
- Using Deauville Scoring to Guide Consolidative Radiotherapy in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.Cancers · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionDespite new therapies for relapsed or refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), treatments with chemotherapy, single-agent rituximab/obinutuzumab, single-agent lenalidomide, or combinations of these agents continue to be commonly used.
methodsThis retrospective study utilized longitudinal data from 4226 real-world electronic health records to characterize outcomes in patients with R/R DLBCL. Eligible patients were diagnosed with DLBCL between January 2010 and March 2022 and had R/R disease treated with ≥ 1 prior systemic line of therapy (LOT), including ≥ 1 anti-CD20-containing regimen.
resultsA total of 573 patients treated with ≥ 1 prior LOT were included (31.2% and 13.4% with ≥ 2 and ≥ 3 prior LOTs, respectively). Median duration of follow-up was 7.7 months. Most patients (57.1%) were male; mean standard deviation (SD) age was 63 (14.7) years. Overall and complete response rates (95% confidence interval (CI) were 52% (48-56) and 23% (19-27). Median duration of response and duration of complete response were 3.5 and 18.4 months. Median progression-free and overall survival (95% CI) was 3.0 (2.8-3.3) and 12.9 (10.1-16.9) months, respectively. Patients with a higher number of prior LOTs, primary refractoriness, refractoriness to last LOT, refractoriness to last anti-CD20-containing regimen, and prior CAR T exposure had worse outcomes (i.e., challenging-to-treat R/R DLBCL) compared with those without these characteristics.
conclusionsOutcomes in patients with R/R DLBCL treated with chemotherapy, single-agent rituximab/obinutuzumab, single-agent lenalidomide, or combinations of these agents remain poor, especially for those with challenging-to-treat R/R DLBCL. These findings underscore the unmet need for new, safe, and effective therapies, especially for challenging-to-treat R/R DLBCL populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.