ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2024
Differential Effect of Patient- and Provider-Level Factors on Patient Satisfaction Scores in Academic General Internal Medicine Clinics.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gender differences in cancer care experiences in Switzerland: a multicentre cross-sectional study.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Patient Perspectives on Point-of-Care Ultrasound Examinations in Consultative Outpatient Internal Medicine Practice.Journal of primary care & community healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveDetermine whether patient-level or provider-level factors have greater influence on patient satisfaction scores in an academic general internal medicine clinic.
methodsTwo years of data (2017-2019) from the Clinician and Group Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CGCAHPS) surveys from ambulatory internal medicine clinic visits in an academic health center located in the Midwest United States were used. Patient satisfaction was measured using the overall provider satisfaction score (0-10), dichotomized with 9-10 defined as satisfactory and 0-8 as unsatisfactory. Provider-level independent variables included age, sex, race/ethnicity, provider type, service type, clinical effort, academic rank, and years since graduation. Patient-level factors included age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, and Epic Risk Score. Generalized mixed-effects logistic regression models were used to investigate associations between top-box satisfaction score and patient- and provider-level factors, accounting for the nesting of patients within providers.
resultsThirty-three providers and 4597 patients were included in the analysis. Male providers (OR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.00, 2.47), minority group 2 (OR, 3.54; 95% CI, 1.24, 10.07) and minority group 3 (OR, 6.04; 95% CI, 1.45, 25.12), faculty (OR, 3.83; 95% CI, 1.56, 9.36), and primary care providers (OR, 5.60; 95% CI, 1.62, 19.34) had increased odds of having a top-box rating compared with females, minority group 1, advanced practice providers, and perioperative providers respectively. Age was the only patient independent correlate of top-box rating with a 3% increased odds of top-box rating for every year increase in age (OR, 1.03; 95% CI 1.02, 1.03).
conclusionsIn this academic general internal medicine clinic, top-box satisfaction scores were more strongly associated with provider-level factors, including provider race/ethnicity, provider type, and service type, as opposed to patient-level factors. Further research is needed to confirm these findings and identify potential system-level interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.