ArticleMolecular biology reports2024
Data mining-based identification of epigenetic signatures with discrimination potential of lung adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma.
Article in Molecular biology reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- Methylation signatures distinguish non-small cell lung cancer subtypes and are associated with survival in smokers with lung squamous cell carcinoma.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMounting evidence suggests that lung adenocarcinoma (LAC) and lung squamous cell carcinoma (LSC) have different biological behaviors and therapeutic regimens in clinical practice. However, limited improvements in molecular differential diagnosis of the two entities have been achieved in recent decades. We aimed to find novel markers that could define non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) subtypes.
methodsWe first explored publically available databases to search for DNA methylation signatures that enable a precise discrimination of LAC and LSC. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) was then used to analyze the methylation status and sites of candidate genes in LAC/LSC tissue samples, and a quantitative methylation-sensitive PCR (qMS-PCR) assay was conducted to test the performance of the selected maker in tissue samples and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) specimens.
resultsWe screened 19 top-ranked methylation loci that are differentially methylated between LAC and LSC. Among these hits, 6 methylation sites are enriched within the PREX1 gene promoter, thus becoming our focus. NGS analysis confirmed markedly higher PREX1 methylation levels in LAC than in LSC and revealed the right sites for detection of PREX1 methylation. Furthermore, PREX1 methylation analysis in lung cancer tissue samples defined 9 of 11 pathologically proven LACs, as well as 12 of 14 LSCs. In addition, ~ 80% LAC BALF samples showed methylated PREX1 compared to substantially lower test positivity (0-9%) of it in LSC and other lung conditions (P < 0.01).
conclusionOur pilot study identified a unique epigenetic signature that could effectively distinguish LAC from LSC in various lung samples. It may enhance our in-depth understanding of the biology of lung cancer and pave the way for better accurate diagnosis and treatment stratification in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.