Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38302767›Full record

ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2024

Biomechanical Effectivity Evaluation of Single- and Double-Metal-Bar Methods with Rotation and Equilibrium Displacements in Nuss Procedure Simulations.

Beop-Yong Lim, Hoseok I, Chiseung Lee

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Simulation and validation of spinal construct testing based on ASTM F1717.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Beop-Yong Lim *Department of Biomedical Engineering, Graduate School, and University Research Park, Pusan National University, Busan, 49241, Republic of Korea.
Hoseok I *Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, School of Medicine, and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan National University, Busan, 49241, Republic of Korea.
Chiseung LeeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan National University, Busan, 49241, Republic of Korea. victorich@pusan.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6840-7750

Funding

Ministry of Education NRF-2021R1I1A1A01055804Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea NRF-2022R1F1A1066509Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea RS-2023-00252034
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surgical treatment of the pectus excavatum has led to the introduction of the Nuss procedure, a minimally invasive surgical procedure that involves inserting a metal bar under the sternum through a small lateral thoracic incision. An additional metal bar was inserted in patients with pectus excavatum to improve the retention of the restored chest wall after the Nuss procedure. However, a need still exists to analyze the mechanistic advantages and disadvantages of the double-bar method owing to the increased surgical time and proficiency. The purpose of this study is to compare and evaluate the efficiency of single- and double-bar methods using rotational and equilibrium displacement simulations of the Nuss procedure. A finite-element model was constructed for two types of metal bars inserted into the chest wall. Boundary conditions for the rotation and equilibrium displacements were set for the metal bar. The anterior sternal translation, Haller index and maximum equivalent stress and strain owing to the behavior of the metal bar were estimated and compared with the single-bar method and postoperatively acquired patient data. The simulation results showed that the influences of the intercostal muscle and equilibrium after rotation displacement were significant. The stresses and strains were distributed across the two metal bars, and the upper-metal bar was heavily loaded. The double-bar method was advantageous regarding the load distribution effects of the two metal bars on the chest wall. However, mechanical assessments are also important because an excessive load is typically applied to the upper-metal bar.

Indexed as

Funnel ChestThoracic WallHumansMetalsMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresRetrospective StudiesRotationTreatment OutcomeMetalsComputer simulationDouble-bar methodFinite-element methodNuss procedurePectus excavatum

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.