Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38302713›Full record

ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2024

Clinical Practice Patterns in Facelift Surgery: A 15-Year Review of Continuous Certification Tracer Data from the American Board of Plastic Surgery.

Michael J Stein, Nikhil Shah, John Harrast, James E Zins, Alan Matarasso, Arun K Gosain

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. There Is No Facelift for All Seasons.Aesthetic surgery journal · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Michael J SteinDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
Nikhil ShahDivision of Plastic Surgery, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, 225 E. Chicago Ave., Box 93, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
John HarrastData Harbor Solutions, Hinsdale, IL, USA.
James E ZinsDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Alan MatarassoDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
Arun K GosainDivision of Plastic Surgery, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, 225 E. Chicago Ave., Box 93, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA. argosain@luriechildrens.org.ORCID 0000-0002-7342-0917
Lenox Hill Hospital · USLurie Children's Hospital · USCleveland Clinic · USData Harbor (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study evaluates change in practice patterns in facelift surgery based on a 15-year review of tracer data collected by the American Board of Plastic Surgery as part of the Continuous Certification process.

methodsTracer data for facelift was reviewed from 2006 to 2021. The 15-year collection period was divided into an "early cohort (EC)" from 2006 to 2014 and a "recent cohort (RC)" from 2015 to 2021.

resultsOf 3400 facelifts (1710 EC/1690 RC) performed, 18% were done in hospital and 76% were done in an accredited office facility. Ninety one percent of patients were female with an average age of 61 years. There was an increase in the number of secondary facelifts (4% EC vs 18% RC; p < 0.001) and an increased number of patients concerned about volume loss/deflation (25% EC vs 37% RC; p < 0.001). The surgical approach to the SMAS involved plication (40%), flaps (35%), SMASectomy (22%) and MACS lift (6%). One percent of facelifts were subperiosteal and 8% skin-only. Significantly more surgeons used the lateral SMAS flap (14% EC vs 18% RC, p < 0.005), while less used an extended SMAS flap (21% vs 18%; p = 0.001) and MACS lift (10% EC vs 6% RC; p = 0.021) techniques. The concomitant use of facial fat grafting is becoming more common (15% EC vs 24% RC, p = 0.0001).

conclusionsA 15-year review of ABPS tracer data provides an excellent venue for the objective assessment of the current status of facelift surgery, and key changes in practice patterns during that time. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Indexed as

RhytidoplastySuperficial Musculoaponeurotic SystemSurgery, PlasticFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPractice Patterns, Physicians'Retrospective StudiesAmerican Board of Plastic SurgeryContinuous certificationFaceliftSurgical complicationsSurgical technique

Identifiers

PMID38302713
OpenAlexW4391427950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.