ArticleScientific reports2024
Wireless body area sensor networks based human activity recognition using deep learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deep-Learning-Based Baseline Evaluation of Public WiFi CSI Datasets for Contactless RF-Based Human Activity Recognition.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Convergent Sensing: Integrating Biometric and Environmental Monitoring in Next-Generation Wearables.Biosensors · 2026Review
- A Comprehensive Methodological Survey of Human Activity Recognition Across Diverse Data Modalities.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- A Structured and Methodological Review on Multi-View Human Activity Recognition for Ambient Assisted Living.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
- Federated Learning for IoMT-Enhanced Human Activity Recognition with Hybrid LSTM-GRU Networks.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Privacy-preserving approach for IoT networks using statistical learning with optimization algorithm on high-dimensional big data environment.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Enhanced human activity recognition in medical emergencies using a hybrid deep CNN and bi-directional LSTM model with wearable sensors.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Fatigue trajectories by wearable remote monitoring of breast cancer patients during radiotherapy.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Multimodal healthcare system for human activity recognition using multiple features and advanced ensemble classifier.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the healthcare sector, the health status and biological, and physical activity of the patient are monitored among different sensors that collect the required information about these activities using Wireless body area network (WBAN) architecture. Sensor-based human activity recognition (HAR), which offers remarkable qualities of ease and privacy, has drawn increasing attention from researchers with the growth of the Internet of Things (IoT) and wearable technology. Deep learning has the ability to extract high-dimensional information automatically, making end-to-end learning. The most significant obstacles to computer vision, particularly convolutional neural networks (CNNs), are the effect of the environment background, camera shielding, and other variables. This paper aims to propose and develop a new HAR system in WBAN dependence on the Gramian angular field (GAF) and DenseNet. Once the necessary signals are obtained, the input signals undergo pre-processing through artifact removal and median filtering. In the initial stage, the time series data captured by the sensors undergoes a conversion process, transforming it into 2-dimensional images by using the GAF algorithm. Then, DenseNet automatically makes the processes and integrates the data collected from diverse sensors. The experiment results show that the proposed method achieves the best outcomes in which it achieves 97.83% accuracy, 97.83% F-measure, and 97.64 Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.