Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38302441›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2024

Visual Feature Tuning Properties of Short-Latency Stimulus-Driven Ocular Position Drift Responses during Gaze Fixation.

Fatemeh Khademi, Tong Zhang, Matthias P Baumann, Tatiana Malevich, Yue Yu, Ziad M Hafed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fatemeh KhademiWerner Reichardt Centre for Integrative Neuroscience, Tübingen University, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1854-4343
Tong ZhangWerner Reichardt Centre for Integrative Neuroscience, Tübingen University, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3280-2756
Matthias P BaumannWerner Reichardt Centre for Integrative Neuroscience, Tübingen University, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5401-7313
Tatiana MalevichWerner Reichardt Centre for Integrative Neuroscience, Tübingen University, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3928-6248
Yue YuWerner Reichardt Centre for Integrative Neuroscience, Tübingen University, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Ziad M HafedWerner Reichardt Centre for Integrative Neuroscience, Tübingen University, 72076 Tübingen, Germany ziad.m.hafed@cin.uni-tuebingen.de.ORCID 0000-0001-9968-119X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ocular position drifts during gaze fixation are significantly less well understood than microsaccades. We recently identified a short-latency ocular position drift response, of ∼1 min arc amplitude, that is triggered within <100 ms by visual onsets. This systematic eye movement response is feature-tuned and seems to be coordinated with a simultaneous resetting of the saccadic system by visual stimuli. However, much remains to be learned about the drift response, especially for designing better-informed neurophysiological experiments unraveling its mechanistic substrates. Here we systematically tested multiple new feature tuning properties of drift responses. Using highly precise eye tracking in three male rhesus macaque monkeys, we found that drift responses still occur for tiny foveal visual stimuli. Moreover, the responses exhibit size tuning, scaling their amplitude (both up and down) as a function of stimulus size, and they also possess a monotonically increasing contrast sensitivity curve. Importantly, short-latency drift responses still occur for small peripheral visual targets, which additionally introduce spatially directed modulations in drift trajectories toward the appearing peripheral stimuli. Drift responses also remain predominantly upward even for stimuli exclusively located in the lower visual field and even when starting gaze position is upward. When we checked the timing of drift responses, we found it was better synchronized to stimulus-induced saccadic inhibition than to stimulus onset. These results, along with a suppression of drift response amplitudes by peristimulus saccades, suggest that drift responses reflect the rapid impacts of short-latency and feature-tuned visual neural activity on final oculomotor control circuitry in the brain.

Indexed as

Fixation, OcularVision, OcularAnimalsEye MovementsMacaca mulattaMaleSaccadesVisual Perceptioncontrast sensitivityfixational eye movementsocular position driftssaccadic inhibitionsaccadic suppressionstimulus size

Identifiers

PMID38302441
PMCPMC10977026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.