ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2024
Reducing False-Positives in CT Perfusion Infarct Core Segmentation Using Contralateral Local Normalization.
Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical evaluation of an automated Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (ASPECTS)-scoring system.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Target mismatch criteria in acute ischemic stroke patients with distal-medium vessel occlusion.European stroke journal · 2026Article
- Target mismatch criteria in acute ischemic stroke patients with distal-medium vessel occlusion.European stroke journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeThe established global threshold of rCBF <30% for infarct core segmentation can lead to false-positives, as it does not account for the differences in blood flow between GM and WM and patient-individual factors, such as microangiopathy. To mitigate this problem, we suggest normalizing each voxel not only with a global reference value (ie, the median value of normally perfused tissue) but also with its local contralateral counterpart. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe retrospectively enrolled 2830 CTP scans with suspected ischemic stroke, of which 335 showed obvious signs of microangiopathy. In addition to the conventional, global normalization, a local normalization was performed by dividing the rCBF maps with their mirrored and smoothed counterpart, which sets each voxel value in relation to the contralateral counterpart, intrinsically accounting for GM and WM differences and symmetric patient individual microangiopathy. Maps were visually assessed and core volumes were calculated for both methods.
resultsCases with obvious microangiopathy showed a strong reduction in false-positives by using local normalization (mean 14.7 mL versus mean 3.7 mL in cases with and without microangiopathy). On average, core volumes were slightly smaller, indicating an improved segmentation that was more robust against naturally low blood flow values in the deep WM.
conclusionsThe proposed method of local normalization can reduce overestimation of the infarct core, especially in the deep WM and in cases with obvious microangiopathy. False-positives in CTP infarct core segmentation might lead to less-than-optimal therapy decisions when not correctly interpreted. The proposed method might help mitigate this problem.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.