Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38301833›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroscience methods2024

Selective REM sleep restriction in mice using a device designed for tunable somatosensory stimulation.

Dillon M Huffman, Asma'a A Ajwad, Anuj Agarwal, Michael E Lhamon, Kevin Donohue, Bruce F O'Hara, Sridhar Sunderam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dillon M HuffmanF. Joseph Halcomb, III M.D. Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Asma'a A AjwadF. Joseph Halcomb, III M.D. Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Anuj AgarwalSignal Solutions, LLC, Lexington, KY, USA.
Michael E LhamonSignal Solutions, LLC, Lexington, KY, USA.
Kevin DonohueSignal Solutions, LLC, Lexington, KY, USA.
Bruce F O'HaraSignal Solutions, LLC, Lexington, KY, USA.
Sridhar SunderamF. Joseph Halcomb, III M.D. Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA. Electronic address: ssu223@uky.edu.

Funding

SYSTEM FOR AUTOMATED NONINVASIVE MONITORING OF MOUSE SLEEP AND BEHAVIORR44NS083218 · NINDS · SIGNAL SOLUTIONS, LLC · PI LHAMON, MICHAEL E, SUNDERAM, SRIDHAR · 2015 to 2016
$995k
SYSTEM FOR AUTOMATED NONINVASIVE MONITORING OF MOUSE SLEEP AND BEHAVIORR43NS083218 · NINDS · SIGNAL SOLUTIONS, LLC · PI O'HARA, BRUCE F, SUNDERAM, SRIDHAR · 2013 to 2014
$343k
NINDS NIH HHS R43 NS083218NINDS NIH HHS R44 NS083218
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSleep perturbation is widely used to investigate the physiological mechanisms that mediate sleep-wake dynamics, and to isolate the specific roles of sleep in health and disease. However, state-of-the-art methods to accomplish sleep perturbation in preclinical models are limited in their throughput, flexibility, and specificity. NEW

methodA system was developed to deliver vibro-tactile somatosensory stimulation aimed at controlled, selective sleep perturbation. The frequency and intensity of stimulation can be tuned to target a variety of experimental applications, from sudden arousal to sub-threshold transitions between light and deep stages of NREM sleep. This device was activated in closed-loop to selectively interrupt REM sleep in mice.

resultsVibro-tactile stimulation effectively and selectively interrupted REM sleep - significantly reducing the average REM bout duration relative to matched, unstimulated baseline recordings. As REM sleep was repeatedly interrupted, homeostatic mechanisms prompted a progressively quicker return to REM sleep. These effects were dependent on the parameters of stimulation applied. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING

methodsExisting sleep perturbation systems often require moving parts within the cage and/or restrictive housing. The system presented is unique in that it interrupts sleep without invading the animal's space. The ability to vary stimulation parameters is a great advantage over existing methods, as it allows for adaptation in response to habituation and/or circadian/homeostatic changes in arousal threshold.

conclusionsThe proposed method of stimulation demonstrates feasibility in affecting mouse sleep within a standard home cage environment, thus limiting environmental stress. Furthermore, the ability to tune frequency and intensity of stimulation allows for graded control over the extent of sleep perturbation, which potentially expands the utility of this technology beyond applications related to sleep.

Indexed as

Sleep, REMSleep, Slow-WaveAnimalsArousalElectroencephalographyHomeostasisMiceSleepAutomated sleep perturbationMouseReal-time sleep classificationREM sleep restrictionSomatosensory stimulation

Identifiers

PMID38301833
PMCPMC10922658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.