Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38301266›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2024

Genome assembly and annotation of the mermithid nematode Mermis nigrescens.

Upendra R Bhattarai, Robert Poulin, Neil J Gemmell, Eddy Dowle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Upendra R BhattaraiDepartment of Anatomy, University of Otago, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-1512-7218
Robert PoulinDepartment of Zoology, University of Otago, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-1390-1206
Neil J GemmellDepartment of Anatomy, University of Otago, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand.
Eddy DowleDepartment of Anatomy, University of Otago, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand.

Funding

Royal Society Te Apārangi Marsden Fund 16-UOO-152
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic studies of nematodes have been dominated by Caenorhabditis elegans as a model species. A lack of genomic resources has limited the expansion of genetic research to other groups of nematodes. Here, we report a draft genome assembly of a mermithid nematode, Mermis nigrescens. Mermithidae are insect parasitic nematodes with hosts including a wide range of terrestrial arthropods. We sequenced, assembled, and annotated the whole genome of M. nigrescens using nanopore long reads and 10X Chromium link reads. The assembly is 524 Mb in size consisting of 867 scaffolds. The N50 value is 2.42 Mb, and half of the assembly is in the 30 longest scaffolds. The assembly BUSCO score from the eukaryotic database (eukaryota_odb10) indicates that the genome is 86.7% complete and 5.1% partial. The genome has a high level of heterozygosity (6.6%) with a repeat content of 83.98%. mRNA-seq reads from different sized nematodes (≤2 cm, 3.5-7 cm, and >7 cm body length) representing different developmental stages were also generated and used for the genome annotation. Using ab initio and evidence-based gene model predictions, 12,313 protein-coding genes and 24,186 mRNAs were annotated. These genomic resources will help researchers investigate the various aspects of the biology and host-parasite interactions of mermithid nematodes.

Indexed as

MermithoideaNematodaAnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansGenomeGenomicsMolecular Sequence Annotationgenome annotationhybrid genome assemblyMermis nigrescensnematoderepeatome

Identifiers

PMID38301266
PMCPMC10989877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.