Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38300822›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine2024

Toward personalized care for insomnia in the US Army: a machine learning model to predict response to cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia.

Frances H Gabbay, Gary H Wynn, Matthew W Georg, Sarah M Gildea, Chris J Kennedy, Andrew J King, Nancy A Sampson, Robert J Ursano, Murray B Stein, James R Wagner and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Bedtime procrastination and sleep disturbances: a call for targeted research and interventions to improve sleep health.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Frances H GabbayDepartment of Psychiatry, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, Maryland.
Gary H WynnDepartment of Psychiatry, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, Maryland.
Matthew W GeorgDepartment of Psychiatry, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, Maryland.
Sarah M GildeaDepartment of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Chris J KennedyDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Andrew J KingDepartment of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Nancy A SampsonDepartment of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Robert J UrsanoDepartment of Psychiatry, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, Maryland.
Murray B SteinDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
James R WagnerInstitute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Ronald C KesslerDepartment of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Vincent F CapaldiDepartment of Psychiatry, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, Maryland.
Harvard University · USUniformed Services University of the Health Sciences · USHenry M. Jackson Foundation · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USUniversity of California, San Diego · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

objectivesThe standard of care for military personnel with insomnia is cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I). However, only a minority seeking insomnia treatment receive CBT-I, and little reliable guidance exists to identify those most likely to respond. As a step toward personalized care, we present results of a machine learning (ML) model to predict CBT-I response.

methodsAdministrative data were examined for n = 1,449 nondeployed US Army soldiers treated for insomnia with CBT-I who had moderate-severe baseline Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) scores and completed 1 or more follow-up ISIs 6-12 weeks after baseline. An ensemble ML model was developed in a 70% training sample to predict clinically significant ISI improvement (reduction of at least 2 standard deviations on the baseline ISI distribution). Predictors included a wide range of military administrative and baseline clinical variables. Model accuracy was evaluated in the remaining 30% test sample.

results19.8% of patients had clinically significant ISI improvement. Model area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (standard error) was 0.60 (0.03). The 20% of test-sample patients with the highest probabilities of improvement were twice as likely to have clinically significant improvement compared with the remaining 80% (36.5% vs 15.7%; χ

conclusionsPending replication, the model could be used as part of a patient-centered decision-making process for insomnia treatment. Parallel models will be needed for alternative treatments before such a system is of optimal value. CITATION: Gabbay FH, Wynn GH, Georg MW, et al. Toward personalized care for insomnia in the US Army: a machine learning model to predict response to cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyMachine LearningMilitary PersonnelPrecision MedicineSleep Initiation and Maintenance DisordersAdultFemaleHumansMaleTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesCBT-Icognitive behavioral therapy for insomniainsomniamachine learningmilitarypersonalized medicinetreatment response

Identifiers

PMID38300822
PMCPMC11145056
OpenAlexW4391474617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.