Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38300689›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2024

User Requirements in Developing a Novel Dietary Assessment Tool for Children: Mixed Methods Study.

Zoë van der Heijden, Femke de Gooijer, Guido Camps, Desiree Lucassen, Edith Feskens, Marlou Lasschuijt, Elske Brouwer-Brolsma

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zoë van der HeijdenDivision of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9243-2430
Femke de GooijerDivision of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2790-757X
Guido CampsDivision of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3136-8671
Desiree LucassenDivision of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9769-6566
Edith FeskensDivision of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5819-2488
Marlou LasschuijtDivision of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1279-6742
Elske Brouwer-BrolsmaDivision of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6829-5090
Wageningen University & Research · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prevalence of childhood obesity and comorbidities is rising alarmingly, and diet is an important modifiable determinant. Numerous dietary interventions in children have been developed to reduce childhood obesity and overweight rates, but their long-term effects are unsatisfactory. Stakeholders call for more personalized approaches, which require detailed dietary intake data. In the case of primary school children, caregivers are key to providing such dietary information. However, as school-aged children are not under the full supervision of one specific caregiver anymore, data are likely to be biased. Recent technological advancements provide opportunities for the role of children themselves, which would serve the overall quality of the obtained dietary data.

objectiveThis study aims to conduct a child-centered exploratory sequential mixed methods study to identify user requirements for a dietary assessment tool for children aged 5 to 6 years.

methodsFormative, nonsystematic narrative literature research was undertaken to delineate initial user requirements and inform prototype ideation in an expert panel workshop (n=11). This yielded 3 prototype dietary assessment tools: FoodBear (tangible piggy bank), myBear (smartphone or tablet app), and FoodCam (physical camera). All 3 prototypes were tested for usability by means of a usability task (video analyses) and user experience (This or That method) among 14 Dutch children aged 5 to 6 years (n=8, 57% boys and n=6, 43% girls).

resultsMost children were able to complete FoodBear's (11/14, 79%), myBear's (10/14, 71%), and FoodCam's (9/14, 64%) usability tasks, but all children required assistance (14/14, 100%) and most of the children encountered usability problems (13/14, 93%). Usability issues were related to food group categorization and recognition, frustrations owing to unsatisfactory functioning of (parts) of the prototypes, recall of food products, and the distinction between eating moments. No short-term differences in product preference between the 3 prototypes were observed, but autonomy, challenge, gaming elements, being tablet based, appearance, social elements, and time frame were identified as determinants of liking the product.

conclusionsOur results suggest that children can play a complementary role in dietary data collection to enhance the data collected by their parents. Incorporation of a training program, auditory or visual prompts, reminders and feedback, a user-friendly and intuitive interaction design, child-friendly food groups or icons, and room for children's autonomy were identified as requirements for the future development of a novel and usable dietary assessment tool for children aged 5 to 6 years. Our findings can serve as valuable guidance for ongoing innovations in the field of children's dietary assessment and the provision of personalized dietary support.

Indexed as

childrendietdietary assessmentmHealthmobile healthmobile phonerecalltechnological innovation

Identifiers

PMID38300689
PMCPMC10870213
OpenAlexW4391434845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.