ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2024
1-Ethyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate pretreatment for maximizing reducing sugar recovery from mixed cabbage residue.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Vegetable waste, including mixed cabbage residue (MCR), is considered a promising raw material for bioenergy production because of its high lignocellulosic component. In this study, the pretreatment of MCR by ionic liquid (IL) 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate ([Emim][OAc]) was optimized based on response surface methodology. The optimal condition for MCR pretreatment was determined at 55.8 °C, with a reaction of 2.65 h and liquid-solid ratio of 4.60:1 v/w. Hydrolysis of pretreated MCR from optimal pretreatment conditions generated a maximum glucose yield of 156.65 ± 7.66 mg/g MCR. Untreated and pretreated MCRs were successfully characterized by scanning electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction, and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. The pretreated MCR exhibited increased clear pores and incomplete structure. Moreover, compared with untreated biomass, decreased lignin, decreased hemicellulose, increased surface area, and cellulose crystallinity were observed. Thus, [Emim][OAc] pretreatment is a promising alternative approach for higher glucose production from MCR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.