Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38300489›Full record

ArticleClinical pharmacokinetics2024

Salivary Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Antimicrobial Therapy: Feasible or Futile?

Lina Davies Forsman, Hannah Yejin Kim, Thi Anh Nguyen, Jan-Willem C Alffenaar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lina Davies ForsmanDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Solna, Sweden.
Hannah Yejin KimSydney Pharmacy School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Building A15, Science Road, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Thi Anh NguyenSydney Pharmacy School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Building A15, Science Road, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Jan-Willem C AlffenaarSydney Pharmacy School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Building A15, Science Road, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia. johannes.alffenaar@sydney.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-6703-0288

Funding

Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney Executive Dean Scholarship in Personalised MedicineHjärt-Lungfonden 20190226Svenska Läkaresällskapet 2018-1256
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Personalised drug dosing through therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is important to maximise efficacy and to minimise toxicity. Hurdles preventing broad implementation of TDM in routine care include the need of sophisticated equipment and highly trained staff, high costs and lack of timely results. Salivary TDM is a non-invasive, patient-friendly alternative to blood sampling, which has the potential to overcome barriers with traditional TDM. A mobile UV spectrophotometer may provide a simple solution for analysing drug concentrations in saliva samples. Salivary TDM utilising point-of-care tests can support personalised dosing in various settings including low-resource as well as remote settings. In this opinion paper, we describe how hurdles of implementing traditional TDM may be mitigated by salivary TDM with new strategies for patient-friendly point-of-care testing.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsDrug MonitoringHumansAnti-Infective Agents

Identifiers

PMID38300489
PMCPMC10954910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.