Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38300479›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2024

Evaluation of Homologous Recombination Deficiency in Ovarian Cancer.

Rubina Ratnaparkhi, Melissa Javellana, Andrea Jewell, Lori Spoozak

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07418671 (Ultrasound Guided Lumbar Erector Spinae Block Using Bupivacaine - Magnesium Sulphate Versus Bupivacaine - Dexamethasone in Total Hip Replacement Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07418671 phase2completednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Ultrasound Guided Lumbar Erector Spinae Block Using Bupivacaine - Magnesium Sulphate Versus Bupivacaine - Dexamethasone in Total Hip Replacement Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorAin Shams UniversityRan2025 to 2025Enrolled66ConditionsPost-operative Pain, Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA), Erector Spinae Plane BlockArmsBupivacaine-Magnesium Sulphate, Bupivacaine-Dexamethasone, Bupivacaine-Saline
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rubina RatnaparkhiDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA. rratnaparkhi@kumc.edu.
Melissa JavellanaDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Andrea JewellDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Lori SpoozakDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
University of Kansas Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

opinion statementHomologous recombination deficiency (HRD) is an important biomarker guiding selection of ovarian cancer patients who will derive the most benefit from poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi). HRD prevents cells from repairing double-stranded DNA damage with high fidelity, PARPis limit single-stranded repair, and together these deficits induce synthetic lethality. Germline or somatic BRCA mutations represent the narrowest definition of HRD, but do not reflect all patients who will have a durable PARPi response. HRD can also be defined by its downstream consequences, which are measured by different metrics depending on the test used. Ideally, all patients will undergo genetic counseling and germline testing shortly after diagnosis and have somatic testing sent once an adequate tumor sample is available. Should barriers to one test be higher, pursuing germline testing with reflex to somatic testing for BRCA wildtype patients or somatic testing first strategies are both evidence-based. Ultimately both tests offer complementary information, germline testing should be pursued for any patient with a history of ovarian cancer, and somatic testing is valuable at recurrence if not performed in the upfront setting. There is a paucity of data to suggest superiority of one germline or somatic assay; therefore, selection should optimize turnaround time, cost to patients, preferred result format, and logistical burden. Each clinic should implement a standard testing strategy for all ovarian cancer patients that ensures HRD status is known at the time of upfront chemotherapy completion to facilitate comprehensive counseling about anticipated maintenance PARPi benefit.

Indexed as

Ovarian NeoplasmsFemaleHomologous RecombinationHumansPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsSynthetic Lethal MutationsPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsGenes, BRCA1*Genes, BRCA2*GermlineHomologous recombination deficiencyOvarian cancerPoly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitorsSomatic

Identifiers

PMID38300479
OpenAlexW4391439005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.