Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38300444›Full record

ArticleBiotechnology letters2024

Performance of a combined electrotrophic and electrogenic biofilm operated under long-term, continuous cycling.

Matthew D Yates, Rebecca L Mickol, Amelia Vignola, Jeffrey W Baldwin, Sarah M Glaven, Leonard M Tender

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Biotechnology letters, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Matthew D YatesCenter for Bio/Molecular Science and Engineering, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC, 20375, USA. matthew.yates@nrl.navy.mil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4373-3864
Rebecca L MickolCenter for Bio/Molecular Science and Engineering, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC, 20375, USA.
Amelia VignolaAcoustics Division, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC, 20375, USA.
Jeffrey W BaldwinAcoustics Division, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC, 20375, USA.
Sarah M GlavenCenter for Bio/Molecular Science and Engineering, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC, 20375, USA.
Leonard M TenderCenter for Bio/Molecular Science and Engineering, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC, 20375, USA.

Funding

US Naval Research Laboratory Internal Base Funding
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesEvaluate electrochemically active biofilms as high energy density rechargeable microbial batteries toward providing persistent power in applications where traditional battery technology is limiting (, remote monitoring applications).

resultsHere we demonstrated that an electrochemically active biofilm was able to store and release electrical charge for alternating charge/discharge cycles of up to 24 h periodicity (50% duty cycle) with no significant decrease in average current density (0.16 ± 0.04 A/m

conclusionsThese results indicate that bidirectional electrogenic/electrotrophic biofilms are capable of efficient charge storage/release over a wide range of cycling frequency and may eventually enable development of sustainable, high energy density rechargeable batteries.

Indexed as

Bioelectric Energy SourcesBiofilmsElectricityElectron TransportBioelectrochemistryBiofilmEnergy storageExtracellular electron transfer

Identifiers

PMID38300444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.