Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38300389›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2024

Two is better than one: longitudinal detection and volumetric evaluation of brain metastases after Stereotactic Radiosurgery with a deep learning pipeline.

Yonny Hammer, Wenad Najjar, Lea Kahanov, Leo Joskowicz, Yigal Shoshan

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Observational
  4. Annotation-efficient deep learning detection and measurement of mediastinal lymph nodes in CT.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yonny HammerSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Edmond. J. Safra Campus, Givat Ram, 9190401, Jerusalem, Israel.
Wenad NajjarDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Lea KahanovDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Leo Joskowicz *School of Computer Science and Engineering, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Edmond. J. Safra Campus, Givat Ram, 9190401, Jerusalem, Israel. josko@cs.huji.ac.il.
Yigal Shoshan *Department of Neurosurgery, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Hadassah Medical Center · ILHebrew University of Jerusalem · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeClose MRI surveillance of patients with brain metastases following Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) treatment is essential for assessing treatment response and the current disease status in the brain. This follow-up necessitates the comparison of target lesion sizes in pre- (prior) and post-SRS treatment (current) T1W-Gad MRI scans. Our aim was to evaluate SimU-Net, a novel deep-learning model for the detection and volumetric analysis of brain metastases and their temporal changes in paired prior and current scans.

methodsSimU-Net is a simultaneous multi-channel 3D U-Net model trained on pairs of registered prior and current scans of a patient. We evaluated its performance on 271 pairs of T1W-Gad MRI scans from 226 patients who underwent SRS. An expert oncological neurosurgeon manually delineated 1,889 brain metastases in all the MRI scans (1,368 with diameters > 5 mm, 834 > 10 mm). The SimU-Net model was trained/validated on 205 pairs from 169 patients (1,360 metastases) and tested on 66 pairs from 57 patients (529 metastases). The results were then compared to the ground truth delineations.

resultsSimU-Net yielded a mean (std) detection precision and recall of 1.00±0.00 and 0.99±0.06 for metastases > 10 mm, 0.90±0.22 and 0.97±0.12 for metastases > 5 mm of, and 0.76±0.27 and 0.94±0.16 for metastases of all sizes. It improves lesion detection precision by 8% for all metastases sizes and by 12.5% for metastases < 10 mm with respect to standalone 3D U-Net. The segmentation Dice scores were 0.90±0.10, 0.89±0.10 and 0.89±0.10 for the above metastases sizes, all above the observer variability of 0.80±0.13.

conclusionAutomated detection and volumetric quantification of brain metastases following SRS have the potential to enhance the assessment of treatment response and alleviate the clinician workload.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsDeep LearningRadiosurgeryBrainHumansRetrospective StudiesBrain metastases detection and segmentationLongitudinal evaluationStereotactic radiosurgery evaluationVolumetric brain metastases assessment

Identifiers

PMID38300389
PMCPMC10876809
OpenAlexW4391434328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.