ArticleMagma (New York, N.Y.)2024
Automated abdominal adipose tissue segmentation and volume quantification on longitudinal MRI using 3D convolutional neural networks with multi-contrast inputs.
Article in Magma (New York, N.Y.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adaptive deep learning for quantification and spatial distribution of abdominal adipose tissue from magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction in adults with a body mass index ≥24 kg/mQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- A multitask deep learning framework for the automated quantification of abdominal tissue morphology on ultrasound and the therapeutic monitoring of diastasis recti abdominis.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Cross-cohort federated learning for pediatric abdominal adipose tissue segmentation and quantification using free-breathing 3D MRI.Radiology advances · 2026Article
- MRI abdominal fat segmentation with a novel VAT/SAT delineation algorithm: Otsu regression calibration and comparison to k-means and fuzzy c-means.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Reproducibility of automatic adipose tissue segmentation using proton density fat fraction images between 1.5 and 3.0 T magnetic resonance.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveIncreased subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue (SAT/VAT) volume is associated with risk for cardiometabolic diseases. This work aimed to develop and evaluate automated abdominal SAT/VAT segmentation on longitudinal MRI in adults with overweight/obesity using attention-based competitive dense (ACD) 3D U-Net and 3D nnU-Net with full field-of-view volumetric multi-contrast inputs. MATERIALS AND
methods920 adults with overweight/obesity were scanned twice at multiple 3 T MRI scanners and institutions. The first scan was divided into training/validation/testing sets (n = 646/92/182). The second scan from the subjects in the testing set was used to evaluate the generalizability for longitudinal analysis. Segmentation performance was assessed by measuring Dice scores (DICE-SAT, DICE-VAT), false negatives (FN), and false positives (FP). Volume agreement was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).
resultsACD 3D U-Net achieved rapid (< 4.8 s/subject) segmentation with high DICE-SAT (median ≥ 0.994) and DICE-VAT (median ≥ 0.976), small FN (median ≤ 0.7%), and FP (median ≤ 1.1%). 3D nnU-Net yielded rapid (< 2.5 s/subject) segmentation with similar DICE-SAT (median ≥ 0.992), DICE-VAT (median ≥ 0.979), FN (median ≤ 1.1%) and FP (median ≤ 1.2%). Both models yielded excellent agreement in SAT/VAT volume versus reference measurements (ICC > 0.997) in longitudinal analysis. DISCUSSION: ACD 3D U-Net and 3D nnU-Net can be automated tools to quantify abdominal SAT/VAT volume rapidly, accurately, and longitudinally in adults with overweight/obesity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.