Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38300310›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2024

Reclassifying BRCA1 c.4358-2A > G and BRCA2 c.475 + 5G > C variants from "Uncertain Significance" to "Pathogenic" based on minigene assays and clinical evidence.

Ying Ning, Yu Zhang, Tian Tian, Yu Chen, Jia Wang, Ke Lei, Zhumei Cui

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. RareOncology letters · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ying Ning *Department of Clinical Medicine, Qingdao University, Qingdao, 266003, China.
Yu Zhang *Department of Clinical Medicine, Qingdao University, Qingdao, 266003, China.
Tian TianDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, No. 59 Haier Road, Laoshan District, Qingdao, 266000, China.
Yu ChenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Qingdao University, Qingdao, 266003, China.
Jia WangCenter of Tumor Immunology and Cytotherapy, Medical Research Center, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, No. 59 Haier Road, Laoshan District, Qingdao, 266000, China.
Ke LeiCenter of Tumor Immunology and Cytotherapy, Medical Research Center, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, No. 59 Haier Road, Laoshan District, Qingdao, 266000, China. leike@qdu.edu.cn.
Zhumei CuiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, No. 59 Haier Road, Laoshan District, Qingdao, 266000, China. cuizhumei1966@qdu.edu.cn.
Qingdao University · CNAffiliated Hospital of Qingdao University · CN

Funding

Qingdao Municipal Science and Technology Bureau 22-3-7-smjk-15-nsh
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPathogenic variants in BRCA genes play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of ovarian cancer. Intronic variants of uncertain significance (VUS) may contribute to pathogenicity by affecting splicing. Currently, the significance of many intronic variants in BRCA has not been clarified, impacting patient treatment strategies and the management of familial cases.

methodA retrospective study was conducted to analyze BRCA intronic VUS in a cohort of 707 unrelated ovarian cancer patients at a single institution from 2018 to 2023. Three splicing predictors were employed to analyze detected intronic VUS. Variants predicted to have splicing alterations were selected for further validation through minigene assays. Patient and familial investigations were conducted to comprehend cancer incidence within pedigrees and the application of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) by the patients. In accordance with the guidelines of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG), the intronic VUS were reclassified based on minigene assay results and clinical evidence.

resultApproximately 9.8% (69/707) of patients were identified as carriers of 67 different VUS in BRCA1/2, with four intronic variants accounting for 6% (4/67) of all VUS. Splicing predictors indicated potential splicing alterations in splicing for BRCA1 c.4358-2A>G and BRCA2 c.475+5G>C variants. Minigene assays utilizing the pSPL3 exon trapping vector revealed that these variants induced changes in splicing sites and frameshift, resulting in premature termination of translation (p. Ala1453Glyfs and p. Pro143Glyfs). According to ACMG guidelines, BRCA1 c.4358-2A>G and BRCA2 c.475+5G>C were reclassified as pathogenic variants. Pedigree investigations were conducted on patients with BRCA1 c.4358-2A>G variant, and the detailed utilization of PARPi provided valuable insights into research on PARPi resistance.

conclusionTwo intronic VUS were reclassified as pathogenic variants. A precise classification of variants is crucial for the effective treatment and management of both patients and healthy carriers.

Indexed as

BRCA2 ProteinOvarian NeoplasmsBRCA1 ProteinFemaleHumansRetrospective StudiesBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, humanBRCA1/2Intronic variantOvarian neoplasmSplice

Identifiers

PMID38300310
PMCPMC10834553
OpenAlexW4391449495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.