Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38300302›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2024

Validating the use of clinical MSCT scans for cranial nonmetric sex estimation in a contemporary Indonesian population.

Ridhwan Lye, Zuzana Obertová, Nur Amelia Bachtiar, Daniel Franklin

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ridhwan LyeCentre for Forensic Anthropology, M420, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia. ridhwan.dawudlye@research.uwa.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8382-1378
Zuzana ObertováCentre for Forensic Anthropology, M420, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5766-4081
Nur Amelia BachtiarRadiology Department, Hasanuddin University, Jalan Perintis Kemerdekaan KM. 10, Talamanrea, Makassar, 90254, Indonesia.
Daniel FranklinCentre for Forensic Anthropology, M420, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2605-1343

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is renewed interest in Asia for the development of forensic anthropological standards, partly due to the need for population-specific models to maintain high classification accuracies. At present, there are no known studies utilising morphoscopic standards specific to the Indonesian population. Craniometric analyses can often be time-consuming; morphoscopic assessments are quicker and are also known to be reliable and accurate. One of the most utilised morphoscopic standards for the estimation of skeletal sex is that of Walker (2008). Its application across population groups demonstrated reduced accuracies outside of the United States; population-specific predictive models would thus serve to improve the identification process of unknown skeletal remains. Digital imaging also allows for the validation of standards on a contemporary population and is an appropriate proxy to physical skeletal material.The present study quantifies the applicability of the Walker standard to a contemporary Indonesian population. A total of 200 cranial MSCT scans from a hospital in Makassar were analysed using OsiriX®. Scoring was performed in accordance with the Walker standard. Five univariate and nine multivariate predictive models were derived using single trait and multi-trait combinations. The best performing univariate model included the glabella, with a total classification accuracy of 82.0% and a sex bias of 14.6%. Classification accuracy with all traits considered was at 95.2% for females and 82.8% for males with a sex bias of 12.5%. These results provide forensic practitioners in Indonesia with an appropriate morphoscopic sex estimation standard, strengthening their capabilities in the field and improving judicial outcomes.

Indexed as

Forensic AnthropologySex Determination by SkeletonSkullAdolescentAdultAgedCephalometryFemaleHumansIndonesiaMaleMiddle AgedMultidetector Computed TomographyYoung AdultCranial nonmetric traitsForensic anthropologyIndonesiaLogistic regressionSex estimationSexual dimorphism

Identifiers

PMID38300302
PMCPMC11164787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.